Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steroids have no studies showing adverse health effects?

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Steroids have no studies showing adverse health effects?

    This is an interesting article regarding the steroid debate. Wonder what the Congressional Committee members will think of this?

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/s ... ics11.html

  • #2
    So did you get Martha's bunk?

    Comment


    • #3
      <So did you get Martha's bunk?>

      Say what?
      "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
      by Thomas Henry Huxley

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Pego
        <So did you get Martha's bunk?>

        Say what?


        Please refer to this thread, where it is revealed that "accelerator" is actually an employee of SNAC (Victor Conte's little project that created ZMA), or may perhaps be Vic himself:

        http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/discus ... hp?t=16127[/url]

        Comment


        • #5
          accelerator

          Thanks. Now I understand.
          "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
          by Thomas Henry Huxley

          Comment


          • #6
            good ele jose says roids are good for you. so being a former MLB player he must be right. (but he also said he grew like 8 inches and could run a 3.9 40, so mabye they just make your brain a little dizzy)

            Comment

            Working...
            X