Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USADA Bombshell!

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USADA Bombshell!

    USADA STATEMENT

    Early in the summer, USADA received a call from a person represented to be a high-profile track and field coach, who provided the names of U.S. and international athletes who he said were using an “undetectable” steroid. The coach subsequently sent USADA a used syringe containing some of this substance. USADA sent the contents of the syringe to the International Olympic Committee accredited anti-doping laboratory at UCLA. Dr. Don Catlin, the head of the laboratory, was able to identify the contents of the syringe and it did contain a designer steroid, which would not have been detectable in normal laboratory testing. UCLA has since developed a test to detect this steroid in athlete urine samples. The steroid, tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), is a designer steroid with a chemical structure similar to other prohibited steroids. In the last few days, several positive ‘A’ sample results for the steroid THG have now been reported to USADA. These results have come from samples collected in-competition at the 2003 USA Outdoor Track & Field Championships and samples collected out-of-competition by USADA. The athletes, USA Track and Field, the national governing body for the sport in the United States, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) and the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) have all been notified of the positive ‘A’ sample results.



    The track and field coach who provided the syringe to USADA identified the source of the “undetectable” steroid as Victor Conte of BALCO (Bay Area Laboratories Co-Operative) Laboratory in Burlingame, Calif. Because this information pointed to potentially illegal activity by the distributor of a controlled substance, USADA contacted the United States Department of Justice.


    “What we have uncovered appears to be intentional doping of the worst sort,” said USADA Chief Executive Officer Terry Madden. “This is a far cry from athletes accidentally testing positive as a result of taking contaminated nutritional supplements. Rather, this is a conspiracy involving chemists, coaches and certain athletes using what they developed to be “undetectable” designer steroids to defraud their fellow competitors and the American and world public who pay to attend sports events.”


    The fact that a track and field coach came to USADA with this information demonstrates the confidence that the sporting community has in USADA to deter doping in sport. The scientific expertise of the UCLA Laboratory was critical to rapidly identifying and developing a method for the detection of THG in urine samples. The USOC is to be highly commended for its cooperation.



    As the anti-doping agency for the Olympic Movement in the United States since October 2000, the United States Anti-Doping Agency’s (USADA) mission is to fight doping to (1) protect the health of athletes, (2) create a level drug-free playing field, and (3) preserve the true spirit of sport. USADA is a non-governmental, nonprofit agency independent of the control of any sporting body. Its activities are open and transparent.



    To stay ahead of the cheaters, USADA is involved in gathering information on how athletes might be using drugs to cheat and in identifying drugs which the cheaters may think are undetectable. USADA has always strongly encouraged athletes and coaches to come forward to USADA on a confidential basis.



    USADA’s mission is to fight doping through drug testing, research and education. USADA conducts nearly 6,500 drug tests on top-level athletes annually. These tests take place both in-competition and out-of-competition without notice at the athletes’ training sites and homes. In the area of education, last year USADA made anti-doping presentations to nearly 2,000 athletes. USADA’s anti-doping educational materials are available on the USADA website (www.usantidoping.org) <http://www.)/> . In the last two years, USADA has awarded more than $3 million in grants for anti-doping research, which is more than any other anti-doping agency in the world. USADA’s research program is focused on those doping substances which are difficult to detect and identifying new doping substances which athletes are using to cheat.


    Rich Wanninger

    Director of Communications and Public Affairs

    U.S. Anti-Doping Agency

  • #2
    Re: USADA Bombshell!

    USADA is conducting a telephonic press conference (started at 10:00 PDT) on the subject now. What it appears we won't hear for some time is any specific names.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: USADA Bombshell!

      They just made the statement that in the wake of this new information they went back and restested 350 samples from USATF Champs and more athletes (no number given) have been told they had A-positives for Modafinil.

      (which, it seems, rhymes with "load of renal" not "daffodil")

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: USADA Bombshell!

        >They just made the statement that in the wake of
        >this new information they went back and restested
        >350 samples from USATF Champs and more athletes
        >(no number given) have been told they had
        >A-positives for Modafinil.

        (which, it seems,
        >rhymes with "load of renal" not "daffodil")

        This has been the whisper talk for weeks. All you had to do was connect a few dots.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: USADA Bombshell!

          http://sports.yahoo.com/sa/news?slug=re ... &type=lgns

          Athletics-USADA reveals positive tests for designer steroid



          LONDON, Oct 16 (Reuters) - The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) said on Thursday it had received notification of positive 'A' samples for the designer steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG).

          USADA said the results came from samples collected in-competition at the 2003 U.S. Outdoor Track & Field Championships and samples collected out-of-competition.

          "What we have uncovered appears to be intentional doping of the worst sort," said USADA Chief Executive Officer Terry Madden in a statement.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: USADA Bombshell!

            Some clarifications that came out during the press conference:

            The "high profile coach" who provided them with the sample is self-described as such. USADA says it doesn't know who he is or if he really is a coach.

            They also admit that they only have his word for it that the syringe came from BALCO.

            They wouldn't talk about the criminal side of the case, other than to note that trafficking in steroids is a criminal offense.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: USADA Bombshell!

              I am already semi-nauseous in thinking about what this could mean to the sport. It sounds as though this could be a significant number of athletes. And, I've got to expect that some of them are going to be high profie.

              With a sport whose reputation is marginal already and public visibility is limited, this could be the most significant step backwards in the sport's history.

              And, unfortunately, if it is BALCO; and, if some of their major sports clients get trapped in this web, it is likely that the indviduals and the specific sports will continue to go merrily along as the behemoths that they are (ala Bill Romanowski, Mark McGwire, Baseball, Football, etc., etc.).

              Yes, it's great that we are trying to keep the sport clean, keep it level, and keep it safe. But what a dark day to have this level of negatives exposed.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: USADA Bombshell!

                As we wait to hear more details, much of our worst fears appear to be coming true. I would like to recommend (some of) the authorities in the USA for pursuing the matter. Let's wait and see how many (if any) athletes are "tagged". Now if only other countries would pursue a similar path - note I am not an American by birth.

                I have no wish to have this note or thread pulled for being undiplomatic. I would appreciate input from those more in the know than I (just simply a low level athlete and a high end track fan since about 1956), as to when "drugs" entered our sport. No athletes to be named please and no "wild charges". Thanks

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: USADA Bombshell!

                  Logic would dictate that "uppers" were in use after WWII (after the way they handed them out to the troops to fight fatigue) and at least up through Rome Olympics in '60 when the guy (Danish cyclist?) died.

                  Steroids were certainly used by the U.S. team at Tokyo in '64 and Mexico '68 (i hasten to add, when they were not illegal).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: USADA Bombshell!

                    ""I am already semi-nauseous in thinking about what this could mean to the sport. It sounds as though this could be a significant number of athletes. And, I've got to expect that some of them are going to be high profie.

                    With a sport whose reputation is marginal already and public visibility is limited, this could be the most significant step backwards in the sport's history.""

                    Tony - I look at it slightly differently. Part of me hopes many elite get caught in the web (and miss the Olympic opportunity next year). A slew of bans will at least send a message that cheating is truly risky business.

                    One step backwards - two steps forward.

                    Question - what is the protocol for awarding/reclaiming medals won both at the USATF and Worlds?

                    Also - if an athlete won a spot on the World's team and subsequently is determined to have cheated at USATF championships to make the top three, I would suspect the forth place finisher would have a damn good civil lawsuit against the cheater given the potential lost revenue from endorsements/winnings/future invitations, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      all about money

                      > In the last two years, USADA has awarded more than $3 million in grants for anti-doping research

                      Where do they get $3 million?

                      That would be $50,000 a year for 30 athletes for 2 years.

                      Who is getting that money now, instead of the athletes?

                      The #1 problem in athletics today is the focus on medical hocus pocus when it SHOULD be about athletic achievement and performance.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: USADA Bombshell!

                        Another way to look at this and similar news is that this means we are one step closer to clarifying in the athletes' minds that drug usage will hang over you like Damocle's sword until you've finally had enough and quit. (Too naive a thought?)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: USADA Bombshell!

                          >One step backwards - two steps forward.>>

                          Problem is, track has taken so many steps backwards, i worry that this one puts us over the cliff and there's no going-forward left possible. We are in IT!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: USADA Bombshell!

                            <Logic would dictate that "uppers" were in use after WWII (after the way they handed them out to the troops to fight fatigue) and at least up through Rome Olympics in '60 when the guy (Danish cyclist?) died.
                            Steroids were certainly used by the U.S. team at Tokyo in '64 and Mexico '68 (i hasten to add, when they were not illegal).>

                            Thanks, GH. Your comments "confirm" suspicions about certain events and athletes at the 1964/68 Olys.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: USADA Bombshell!

                              this is all old news from at least one month ago. all you got now is the lurid details of how UCLA came to figure out the designer steroid. the smart questions ought to be:
                              1. what axe does this "coach" have to grind;
                              2.why did this coach come out anonymously. Please stand up!;
                              3. why should anyone believe this anonymous witness;

                              This is a WEAK case or no case at all.

                              Now the REALLY interesting thing to me under what rule can the IAAF go back and test for a new substance (Modofinil) or this designer steroid...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X