This one has some more background on the history of steroid use etc.
http://www.aafla.org/SportsLibrary/JSH/ ... h1401g.pdf
If the Francis article is true concerning the genabol thing in Sydney it leads me to a new question. What has changed? Why in 2003 are we finally having retests when it certainly appeared we could have possibly been doing this in 2000 (genabol), or 2002 (norbolethone). Is it the USADA, WADA or new leadership in the IAAF? Personally I think they should retest anything they have around for genabol, norbolethone and THG.
http://www.aafla.org/SportsLibrary/JSH/ ... h1401g.pdf
If the Francis article is true concerning the genabol thing in Sydney it leads me to a new question. What has changed? Why in 2003 are we finally having retests when it certainly appeared we could have possibly been doing this in 2000 (genabol), or 2002 (norbolethone). Is it the USADA, WADA or new leadership in the IAAF? Personally I think they should retest anything they have around for genabol, norbolethone and THG.
Comment