...is referred to on the front page:
http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/tfn/di ... jsp?id=260
From that USADA press release:
“I am aware of Mr. Burrton’s comments following today’s meeting. It is clear from those comments that Mr. Burton rejects the idea of a non-analytical positive and contends that only athletes who test positive or admit to a violation can be sanctioned,†Tygart stated. “Without commenting on the specifics of any case, USADA confirms that that Mr. Burton is absolutely incorrect in his position.â€
From the SFGate.com:
"If she had something to hide, she wouldn't have answered every question," said Burton.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ... DT0112.DTL
Back to the press release:
“To avoid any subsequent misunderstanding we had asked if Ms. Jones would agree to have a court reporter present at the meeting or otherwise have it recorded. She would not agree."
Why not if there is nothing to hide?
http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/tfn/di ... jsp?id=260
From that USADA press release:
“I am aware of Mr. Burrton’s comments following today’s meeting. It is clear from those comments that Mr. Burton rejects the idea of a non-analytical positive and contends that only athletes who test positive or admit to a violation can be sanctioned,†Tygart stated. “Without commenting on the specifics of any case, USADA confirms that that Mr. Burton is absolutely incorrect in his position.â€
From the SFGate.com:
"If she had something to hide, she wouldn't have answered every question," said Burton.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ... DT0112.DTL
Back to the press release:
“To avoid any subsequent misunderstanding we had asked if Ms. Jones would agree to have a court reporter present at the meeting or otherwise have it recorded. She would not agree."
Why not if there is nothing to hide?
Comment