Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

[MJD]

Re: Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

"Williams said he believes Collins is a clean athlete, but he said he has not discussed details of the situation with her."

http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/stor ... 1070c.html

[bubba]

Re: Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

>USTF can offer NOTHING ... they do not deal with anti-doping matters.

It isn't their job. Since late 2000 that is the job of USADA and WADA.

[WestCoastTrackFan]

Re: Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

USTF can offer NOTHING ... they do not deal with anti-doping matters.

[marknhj]

Re: Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

So how pervasive are drugs in athletics? Collins not only appears to have got the gear from Conte but also says in the email to him that she got the testosterone gel from someone else...

[gh]

Re: Evidence against Collins substantial-NYTimes

an URL that doesn't require registration:

http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/dulut ... 797812.htm

[Friar]

"The evidence against Collins appears to be substantial, including a calendar purporting to list a doping schedule, results of blood tests sent to Balco and e-mail messages sent from Collins to Victor Conte Jr., the founder of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, which is at the center of the steroids case,said a person who has"seen the evidence."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/29/sport ... 9STER.html
I'm sure they want information from Michele but what can USTF offer? Her violations appear so serious that she would have be punnished at least as equally as K.White.