I might have told this story.......

[tafnut]

hahahaha!!!!!!

We've come full circle on this now, with precious little insight gained. Perhaps we could just bury this thread and return our sights on the upcoming season (no matter how much we all love playing in the street! )

[EPelle]

[quote=*_*]

Not the point! If you are that busy then why concern yourself with something you have little time for?

May as well through in the towel when it comes to sex then.

If you are going to be critical of somebodies sexual prowess, you better have game....hahahaha!!!!!![/quote:j62rmkcj]
You do have some complex, am I right? I am not critical of your sexual prowess, rather stated that when it comes to "concerning yourself with something you have little time for", why bother if you are that busy? Does not this example hold the same water as yours?

[Jon]

you better have game

And by that he means 'you better have started a lot of threads in the historical section of this messageboard.'

[Brutal]

Not the point! If you are that busy then why concern yourself with something you have little time for?

May as well through in the towel when it comes to sex then.

If you are going to be critical of somebodies sexual prowess, you better have game....hahahaha!!!!!!

[EPelle]

Not the point! If you are that busy then why concern yourself with something you have little time for?

May as well through in the towel when it comes to sex then.

[Brutal]

All I know is that it was March the last time you had an original thought here. I suggest you cool the criticism unless you plan on getting more involved. I also don't drink bourbon and probably make more off my renewals in a year than you make at that mag. Ex-insurance sales.

OK, twist it in whichever way you need to in order to convince yourself that you 'win' this argument, but the facts are there for all to see. I'd love to 'get more involved' but a full-time job prevents me from doing that.

When I'm your age (you're what? 60? 70?), I'll be sure to leave a copy of all my accounts and earnings records by your graveside.

Not the point! If you are that busy then why concern yourself with something you have little time for? I usually don't have all this time either. I'm off work for a couple weeks. I was also gone for a few months.

I'm 56, but don't feel a day over 52...ha!

[Jon]

All I know is that it was March the last time you had an original thought here. I suggest you cool the criticism unless you plan on getting more involved. I also don't drink bourbon and probably make more off my renewals in a year than you make at that mag. Ex-insurance sales.

OK, twist it in whichever way you need to in order to convince yourself that you 'win' this argument, but the facts are there for all to see. I'd love to 'get more involved' but a full-time job prevents me from doing that.

When I'm your age (you're what? 60? 70?), I'll be sure to leave a copy of all my accounts and earnings records by your graveside.

[EPelle]

Man, I feel like I:m arguing with Satch.

[Brutal]

Lemme get this straight... to measure how much "game" a person 'got', we count the number of threads they have started in the historical section of the track and field news message board? Sounds like a new rule to me, but if you want to go there, I have started 314 topics in the historical section, compared to your 'paltry' 216.

Now, it's pushing 1.15pm on the East Coast of Britain, so instead of just ramblin' on here, I'm going to get back to my job at AW mag. I suggest you go back to your bourbon and blues.

All I know is that it was March the last time you had an original thought here. I suggest you cool the criticism unless you plan on getting more involved. I also don't drink bourbon and probably make more off my renewals in a year than you make at that mag. Ex-insurance sales.

[MJD]

Not started-been involved in-doesn't change the point though.

[Jon]

Lemme get this straight... to measure how much "game" a person 'got', we count the number of threads they have started in the historical section of the track and field news message board? Sounds like a new rule to me, but if you want to go there, I have started 314 topics in the historical section, compared to your 'paltry' 216.

Now, it's pushing 1.15pm on the East Coast of Britain, so instead of just ramblin' on here, I'm going to get back to my job at AW mag. I suggest you go back to your bourbon and blues.

[MJD]

43 enough?

[Brutal]

I had to go to March of 2005 to find something he originated here on this board.

I rest my case.

Now do the same on 'Current Events' and 'Dope Talk'. And remember, unlike you, I don't repeat topics.

I rest my case.

Who was talking Current Events and Dope Talk? Not me! You are "here" being critical. Why?

Big difference between history and current events. Why criticize at all? Especially considering you do little "here."

I think talking about the dope situation is crazy. Am I over there telling everyone that? Nope!

[MJD]

I'll take Brutal and Rob any day of the week over LO.

LO, you have yet to respond to my private message. Who are you?

Presented without comment an excerpt from the guidelines:

1....If you're going to make provocative posts, have the cojones to stand behind them.

Tick tock LO.

[Jon]

I had to go to March of 2005 to find something he originated here on this board.

I rest my case.

Now do the same on 'Current Events' and 'Dope Talk'. And remember, unlike you, I don't repeat topics.

I rest my case.