Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
In Praise of Brittney Reese
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
In doing the write-up of the 2021 OT for the 2024 OT e-book on the T&FN site I realised that Reese may be the best OT competitor ever - 4 OT consecutive wins [better than Lewis or Oerter [who never won - he was saving himself for later each year] - and every time she won it was with a seasonal best, twice with PRs including in 2016 her lifetime best.
-
The men face the same issue. I don't know if King Carl spoiled us but I miss the days when 27'6" was the beginning of the conversation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by El Toro View Post
Where are all the 23m women's shot putters, a standard that should have been met by now, as we watched the triple jump WR go from 49 feet to 50 feet to 51 feet...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CookyMonzta View Post
A standard that should have been met by now, as we watched the triple jump WR go from 49 feet to 50 feet to 51 feet...
Leave a comment:
-
The 80s and 90s had other things that make it difficult to compare eras.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Steele View PostWhere are the 24 footers? In the 80s.
The WR that Yulimar Rojas broke was set by a 24-foot long jumper (Kravets 7.37 in 1992). Thirteen of the thirty-seven 24-footers came in the 1990s, 2 from 2000 onwards. Reese (7.31 in 2016) and Mihambo (7.30 in 2019) have been the closest since.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wiederganger View PostJJK showed no appetite for World Indoor titles, so that's her fault. And Worlds aside, Reese has a superior Olympic record, and that's the pinnacle and prime event.
Leave a comment:
-
And yet, the question that sticks out like a sore thumb remains: Where are the 24-footers? Since Heike and Jackie retired, only two (Tatyana Kotova 7.42 in 2002, and Tatyana Lebedeva 7.33 in 2004) have broken 24 feet. Add Simagina, Reese and Mihambo, and you have 5 who have jumped at least 7.25 since Sydney 2000. Only 7 (+Kolchanova) have jumped 7.20.
At a time when triple-jumps of 15 meters (starting with Ana Biryukova in 1993), 50 feet and even 51 feet are coming like clockwork, you'd think the 24-foot barrier would have been reached by many on the world circuit and many times over. But unlike in the 1980s and 1990s, it is just not happening, even at the 7.20m mark, where only 2 (again, Reese and Mihambo) have jumped that far in the last decade.
In this event, given how several women (not just Heike and JJK) rewrote the standard in this event, right now performance matters as much as the honors a particular individual has won. The competition was so much more formidable back then, compared to today.
So, forgive me if I'm not yet sold on winning marks in the 6.80-7.19 range (with a big exception for Brittney winning very ugly in 2011), when we've had winners jumping as far as 7.40, with the rest of the top 3 in the same competition farther than 7.10 on more than one occasion. Today's jumpers would have had their lunch money snatched by the jumpers of the 1980s and 1990s. And make no mistake; the competition that Jackie had (even without Heike) was tougher than what Brittney had this past decade and a half, and many of them jumped much farther on the circuit.
Wiederganger: You missed a couple of items in your medal comparison: Jackie finished 5th in Los Angeles 1984, and Brittney failed to qualify at the 2015 World Champs in Beijing.
Be that as it may, the quality of the performances, to go with the competitors, mattered to me more. And those world circuit performances (consider Sestriere 1994) steered me toward keeping Jackie as my #2. If Brittney had cracked a couple of 24-footers along the way (one at a very big meet, not necessarily the Olympics or World Champs), she might have made a better case for me.Last edited by CookyMonzta; 09-19-2021, 02:32 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gh View PostIn addition to having to go up against Drechsler in her prime, JJK also had fewer WC opportunities, like no indoor in '85 because the meet hadn't been invented yet,, and WC outdoors in '85 and '89 because it wa still on a 4-year cycle. Having said that, I'd also take Reese over JJK, however. But it's very close, all things considered. It's easy to overrate people from the '90s on just because of the number of WC opportunities they have.
JJK showed no appetite for World Indoor titles, so that's her fault. And Worlds aside, Reese has a superior Olympic record, and that's the pinnacle and prime event.
Leave a comment:
-
In addition to having to go up against Drechsler in her prime, JJK also had fewer WC opportunities, like no indoor in '85 because the meet hadn't been invented yet,, and WC outdoors in '85 and '89 because it wa still on a 4-year cycle. Having said that, I'd also take Reese over JJK, however. But it's very close, all things considered. It's easy to overrate people from the '90s on just because of the number of WC opportunities they have.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wiederganger View Post
Really? HD yes*, but Reese overtakes JJK as number 2:
JJK V Reese:
Olympics - JJK has 1 gold and 2 bronze, Reese has 1 gold and 2 silvers (and one 5th place)
Worlds - JJK has 2 gold, a 5th & a 6th; Reese has 4 gold and an 8th
World Indoors - JJK 0, Reese has 3 golds
WRs - JJK 1 , Reese 0
No1 Rankings - JJK 3 x number 1 and 2 x number 2; Reese has 7 x number 1 rankings, 2 x number 3, and a 2/3 from this season - watch this space.
How is JJK set in stone above Reese? Reese is clearly above JJK now, she beats her in every dept apart form that one WR? I think JJK's overall haul is clouding their judgement on her LJ alone.
(*HD different as a better Olym record and with 10 x number 1 rankings & 4 x number 2 rankings, plus 3 WRs outdoors, not even mentioning her WRs indoors and over 400 7m+ jumps)
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: