Originally posted by J Rorick
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can you try to name 3 countries who have never won any olympic T&F medal?...
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by El Toro View Post
Must be close. When discussing Bahamas stadium recently, I remember they are at ~400k and I know Barbados is definitely smaller. I don't know exactly how small, maybe 1/2 - 3/4? But how big is Iceland?
Comment
-
-
Are these the 3 smallest independent countries that have participated in Olympic track and field and not medaled?
Nauru 10k population
Tuvalu 12k
Cook Islands 17k
There have been 11 babies born in Antarctica, they are between the ages of 13 and 44. Could they form an Olympic Committee ? Would be appropriate for them to enter the winter games with a curling team.
Last edited by DET59; 10-01-2022, 01:12 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DET59 View Post
There have been 11 babies born in Antarctica, they are between the ages of 13 and 44. Could they form an Olympic Committee ? Would be appropriate for them to enter the winter games with a curling team.
Does raise some interesting questions about nationality status arising from being born there though. One of the differences between countries is that some countries automatically confer citizenship on anyone born in the country while others don't. I believe that the US is in the former group and the UK in the latter. Does this apply to Antarctic territorial claims?Last edited by Trickstat; 10-02-2022, 07:12 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trickstat View Post
Chances are that none of them currently live in Antarctica as I think scientists tend to do stints done there of a year or so. As I understand it, the IOC are now only accepting new members that are sovereign nations.
Does raise some interesting questions about nationality status arising from being born there though. One of the differences between countries is that some countries automatically confer citizenship on anyone born in the country while others don't. I believe that the US is in the former group and the UK in the latter. Does this apply to Antarctic territorial claims?
Based on the last time I had to read up on this for work purposes, I believe that various treaty signatories have a range of positions:- claims (some overlapping), reject some or all claims or reserve the right to make future claims, and there's also territory not subject to any claims. However, all this is basically put aside while the treaty is in force and the parties agreed not to enforce claims and to collaborate so as not to create discord on the continent.
Given that awarding citizenship based on Antarctic births is done internally by the treaty partners, it is not covered in the treaty as far as I know. This leads us back to each countries specific legislation and flexibility to grant citizenship in non-automatic situations. There's 50 or so parties to the treaty currently so there's no chance in hell that I will make a table on this topic!
Earlier post, including links to info on historical Antarctic births: https://forum.trackandfieldnews.com/...970-antarctica
Comment
Comment