Originally posted by Trickstat
View Post
Based on the last time I had to read up on this for work purposes, I believe that various treaty signatories have a range of positions:- claims (some overlapping), reject some or all claims or reserve the right to make future claims, and there's also territory not subject to any claims. However, all this is basically put aside while the treaty is in force and the parties agreed not to enforce claims and to collaborate so as not to create discord on the continent.
Given that awarding citizenship based on Antarctic births is done internally by the treaty partners, it is not covered in the treaty as far as I know. This leads us back to each countries specific legislation and flexibility to grant citizenship in non-automatic situations. There's 50 or so parties to the treaty currently so there's no chance in hell that I will make a table on this topic!
Earlier post, including links to info on historical Antarctic births: https://forum.trackandfieldnews.com/...970-antarctica
Leave a comment: