Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Smith Disputes Carlos Version Of '68 Race In New Book
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Re: Smith Disputes Carlos Version Of '68 Race In New Book
Originally posted by gh's linkCarlos says he let Smith win -- that what he, Carlos, truly cared about was making a statement on the victory stand. So, according to Carlos, the important thing was to finish in the top three.
Coming out of the turn, it is indisputable that Carlos was in front by about a meter and a half. He said he was in control of the race, then slowed down to let Smith pass him.
"Man, if you look at the tape, the tape would explain it all," Carlos said in a recent telephone interview. "It's obvious I was out in front of that race. If you look, you see me slow down. You see me say some things," to Smith, telling him to hurry up.
"The bottom line is, he has the gold medal," Carlos also said. "But what happened in that race -- I can't lie to myself or to the public."
Smith says Carlos can't handle the truth.
-
Originally posted by DaisyOriginally posted by SQUACKEEOne reason to never let anyone win a serious competion is its cruel to the guy who did win. It cheapens they're efforts.He still hates me. :cry:
phsstt!
Comment
-
Carlos has been saying that for decades. I've never bought it, but I do think (and thought the instant the race unfolded) that once he saw Tommie was going to win he pretty much lost interest in the race and didn't even try to hold Norman off for the silver.
Comment
-
unfortunately for Carlos there is a pesky little bit of footage out there that shows the whole race.
My own opinion is that Carlos and Norman spent way too much in the rounds. Tommie could afford it, they could not. Had they been more judicious they would have been under 20 no problem in the final. But under no circumstances were they in the league of big daddy long legs.. He was operating at 19.6 speeds that week...
I have seen the race more than a few times and I dont see Carlos holding off Norman regardless of his intentions.. He is just plain spent, as I view it he is giving his all to get to the tape, leaning and pushing .. there is simply nothing left in the tank for the big man.
Carlos should take a different approach to the race and simply sell his Mexico city performance for what it was, one of the greatest displays of raw speed in an opening 100m of a 200m race ever seen, I time him at 10.2 on that curve and he was a big man and that was a tight curve...... it was spectacular and it showed that in Mexico he was a legitimate threat for double individual sprint medals. He deserved to be on that 4x1. If any American sprinter's medal total underrepresents his talent it is Carlos' single bronze.
Also in Carlos' favor, had he been healthy and ready in 72 he was the one American that probably had the hardware to beat Borzov. The 69/70 Carlos nips the 72 Borzov.... nothing really ever changes my friend, new lines for old, new lines for old.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by JacksfSmith BLOWS by Carlos....watch it for yourselves..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--lzACn0aZ8
If he's telling the truth just think how unfair that is to his wife/girlfriend, highschool coach, family, friends and coaches .He let someone else win. All those people who love him and wanted him to win so badly.
He didnt give his best. He cheated everyone of this priceless once in a lifetime olympic performance.
Very sad if true for all everyone involved. Puts a tainted victory for the great Tommy Smith. Its pathetic John. How dare you. Makes me sick.phsstt!
Comment
-
Carlos' explanation is absolutely bonkers. How would throwing the race alter the podium finish? If he repeats this nonsense again the IOC should call his bluff and investigate his ridiculous claim for bringing the sport into disrepute. Race fixing is usually the preserve of gambling syndicates after all, and besides, deliberately losing would cut against the ethos of the sport. One would hope he was just yanking people's chain with the typical ego of a sprinter, because otherwise his story is so full of holes it practically implies brain damage. And it's pretty cheap using a legendary civil rights demonstration to cover his limitations as an athlete, even if he was responsible for staging it. That's gotta be the worst excuse for losing I ever heard. If his point was that the result of the race is inconsequential to him next to the opportunity the Olympics afforded him to impart his message globally, well then that's cool, but by god should he have found a better way to say so gracefully.
Comment
Comment