1992 Olympic 100 meter results

do anyone know of a site where i can get the full results for the 100 meters for all rounds?

[waynehobley]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

men or women?

[waynehobley]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

Men's 100m. Final. Olympic Games 1992


1. Linford Christie (GBR) 9.96
2. Frankie Fredericks (NAM) 10.02
3. Dennis Mitchell (USA) 10.04
4. Bruny Surin (CAN) 10.09
5. Leroy Burrell (USA) 10.10
6. Olapade Adeniken (NGR) 10.12
7. Ray Stewart (JAM) 10.22
8. Davidson Ezinwa (NGR) 10.26

Women's 100m. Final. Olympic Games 1992

1. Gail Devers (USA) 10.82
2. Juliet Cuthbert (JAM) 10.83
3. Irina Privalova (CIS) 10.84
4. Gwen Torrence (USA) 10.86
5. Merlene Ottey (JAM) 10.86
6. Anelia Nuneva (BUL) 11.10
7. Mary Onyali (NGR) 11.15
8. Liliana Allen (CUB) 11.19

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

i looking for all the rounds (heats, quarters, semis, and final)

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

Wilma Rudolph's 1960 finals time of 11.00 would have still acquitted her well in '92. Naturally, advanced weight training and the speed of a modern "field" of competitors, synthetic surfaces would shave time off any great 1960-1964 sprinter's times in a 1992 world.

Bijan

[Powell]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

>Wilma Rudolph's 1960 finals time of 11.00 would have still acquitted her well
>in '92.

It was NOT 11.00, but 11.18 (or 11.0 with hand timing). Plus the wind was +2.76 mps. Rudolph was a great runner in her time, but let's not carried away with it.

[The King]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

>It was NOT 11.00, but 11.18 (or 11.0 with hand timing). Plus the wind was +2.76 mps. Rudolph was a great runner in her time, but let's not carried away with it.

The wind-speed for the Women's 100m final was
-1.0m/s headwind! Using this calculator http://desert.jsd.claremont.edu/~newt/t ... index.html and using the correct information of venues and altitude this time is corrected to 10.75s without wind or with a still wind of +0.0m/s.

[The King]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

20m Split times of the race are given on this coaching page; http://www.brianmac.demon.co.uk/sprints/index.htm

Wind Speed (of the race): +0.5m/s
Linford Christie (GBR), 1st place 9.96s
RT: 0.139s (round-up to 0.14s)
20m: 2.93s (2.79s)
40m: 4.74s (1.81s)
60m: 6.48s (1.74s)
80m: 8.22s (1.74s)
100m: 9.96s (1.74s)
60/40m Splits:
6.48s/3.48s = 9.96s

Frankie Fredericks (NAM), 2nd place 10.02s
RT: 0.138s (round-up to 0.14s)
20m: 2.91s (2.77s)
40m: 4.74s (1.83s)
60m: 6.50s (1.76s)
80m: 8.26s (1.76s)
100m: 10.02s (1.76s)
60/40m Splits:
6.50s/3.52s = 10.02s

Dennis Mitchell (USA), 3rd place 10.04s
RT: 0.143s (round-up to 0.15s)
20m: 2.93s (2.78s)
40m: 4.76s (1.83s)
60m: 6.52s (1.76s)
80m: 8.28s (1.76s)
100m: 10.04s (1.76s)
60/40m Splits:
6.52s/3.52s = 10.04s

Bruny Surin (Can), 4th place 10.09s
RT: 0.124s (round-up to 0.13s)
20m: 2.89s (2.76s)
40m: 4.72s (1.83s)
60m: 6.50s (1.78s)
80m: 8.28s (1.78s)
100m: 10.09s (1.81s)
60/40m Splits:
6.50s/3.59s = 10.09s

Leory Burrell (USA), 5th place 10.10s
RT: 0.165s (round-up to 0.17s)
20m: 2.99s (2.82s)
40m: 4.82s (1.83s)
60m: 6.58s (1.76s)
80m: 8.32s (1.74s)
100m: 10.10s (1.78s)
60/40m Splits:
6.58s/3.52s = 10.10s

Olapade Adeniken (NGR), 6th place 10.12s
RT: 0.183s (round-up to 0.19s)
20m: 3.01s (1.82s)
40m: 4.84s (1.83s)
60m: 6.58s (1.74s)
80m: 8.34s (1.76s)
100m: 10.12s (1.78s)
60/40m Splits:
6.58s/3.54s = 10.12s

Ray Stewart (JAM), 7th place 10.22s
RT: 0.154s (round-up to 0.16s)
20m: 2.95s (2.79s)
40m: 4.78s (1.83s)
60m: 6.56s (1.78s)
80m: 8.36s (1.80s)
100m: 10.22s (1.86s)
60/40m Splits:
6.56s/3.56s = 10.22s

Davidson Ezinwa (NGR), 8th place 10.26s
RT: 0.172s (round-up to 0.18s)
20m: 2.99s (2.81s)
40m: 4.84s (1.85s)
60m: 6.62s (1.78s)
80m: 8.42s (1.80s)
100m: 10.26s (1.84s)
60/40m Splits:
6.62s/3.64s = 10.26s

[Powell]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

>>It was NOT 11.00, but 11.18 (or 11.0 with hand timing). Plus the wind was
>+2.76 mps. Rudolph was a great runner in her time, but let's not carried away
>with it.

>The wind-speed for the Women's 100m final was
>-1.0m/s headwind!

Give your source, please. That final was definitely windy, and the automatic timing gave 11.18 as the time. I took these figures from the official IAAF world records book, but you can see them in other places, too - http://www.gbrathletics.com/ic/ogw.htm is one.

[Jon]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

And here's another source that says it's windy...

http://trackfield.brinkster.net/Profile ... 4&Gender=W


Her official (hand-timed) PB is 11.2

Her best electronic timing was 11.41

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

what in the world are you guys talking about, i asked for information about the 1992 olympic 100 meter results for all the rounds

[Jon]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

>what in the world are you guys talking about, i asked for information about the
>1992 olympic 100 meter results for all the rounds



As with pretty much all threads, the discussion usually goes off in a different direction to the question that's originally asked. Probably because no-one yet has the answer to your query.

Be patient, though. Someone's bound to come up with the answer soon.

[The King]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

Sorry I meant for the 1992 Barcelona OG Women's 100m final. I didn't copy the write sentence for my reply. Sorry for the confusion.

[The King]

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

>>>It was NOT 11.00, but 11.18 (or 11.0 with hand timing). Plus the wind
>was
>+2.76 mps. Rudolph was a great runner in her time, but let's not carried
>away
>with it.

>The wind-speed for the Women's 100m final was
>-1.0m/s
>headwind!

Give your source, please. That final was definitely windy, and the
>automatic timing gave 11.18 as the time. I took these figures from the official
>IAAF world records book, but you can see them in other places, too -
>http://www.gbrathletics.com/ic/ogw.htm is one.

Sorry I meant for the 1992 Barcelona OG Women's 100m final. I didn't copy the write sentence for my reply. Sorry for the confusion.

Re: 1992 Olympic 100 meter results

"As with pretty much all threads, the discussion usually goes off in a different direction to the question that's originally asked."

I thought that was the point!