Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

20.13..forever?

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Kishan Gill
    eldrick is a big carl lewis fan and can't accept that a 200m/400m guy is superior to a 100/200 sprinter in the 200m. MJ has said countless times it is all about speed endurance...
    i was looking for your refutation to above arithmetic argument ( it was on the last page which you didn't read ? )

    thank you for not providing one...

    still, here's another one you can kindly provide us with a non-refutation i can await with non-bated breathe

    list of guys' splits in the 200/open 100m time same meet

    - frankie 10.16/9.89 = 0.27s

    - ato 10.18/9.90 = 0.28

    - bolt 9.96/9.69 = 0.27

    but bolt was worth more like 9.65 as didn't run hard to end -> 0.31

    therefore, range of 0.27 - 0.31s split differential between split & open 100

    applying to mj's 10.12 ->

    9.81 - 9.85

    Comment


    • list of fastest splits i know off in 200

      - 9.96 bolt

      - ?10.06 tyson in his 19.63

      - 10.12 mj

      - 10.16 ff

      - 10.18 marsh in his 19.73 ( ran 9.93 that year )

      - 10.18 ato

      next fastest iirc are

      10.23 - King in his 19.80 og win ( it wasn't in his 19.75 - that was 10.3+ )

      10.3+ x-man in his 19.63

      ( never seen a split for wally's 19.65 or dix's 19.69 - latter on vid, but clarity not good enough to get you within +/- 0.1s )

      use the benchmark of 10.20 :

      6 men have broken it

      5 of them have never broken 45s , with the slowest 100pb is 10.09 ( mj ), next being marsh with 9.93

      5 of the 6 have pbs ( all set in same year as 200 split, but some subsequently broken ) well below 10, slowest being 9.93

      Comment

      Working...
      X