Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Johnson beats Donovan Bailey...

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael Johnson beats Donovan Bailey...

    ..in the 1996 Olympic games. If he was capable of 19.32 no doubt he had 9.8ish jets....right? Didn't he blow away 9.8ers Frankie Fredericks and Ato Boldon to the bend in the 200m? Could he have won both sprints then blew Surin away on that third leg of the 4x1 giving Mitchell the lead?

  • #2
    i'll do it as a poll

    let the readers decide...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by eldrick
      i'll do it as a poll

      let the readers decide...
      Letsrun...hmm?

      Comment


      • #4
        i hope that was not meant as an insult to posters here, comparing them to a juvenile board ?

        anyways, i put up a poll as you clearly don't know how to

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by eldrick
          i hope that was not meant as an insult to posters here, comparing them to a juvenile board ?

          anyways, i put up a poll as you clearly don't know how to
          So full of yourself with so little reason...sheesh! Eldrick I have never even thought about a poll. I do know if you can do it it can't be to complex,

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Texas
            I have never even thought about a poll
            exactly

            you don't think

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by eldrick
              Originally posted by Texas
              I have never even thought about a poll
              exactly

              you don't think
              You do? So far all I've seen is a sad little guy trying to prove some point he doesn't even understand. That's thinking?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Texas
                Originally posted by eldrick
                Originally posted by Texas
                I have never even thought about a poll
                exactly

                you don't think
                You do?
                evidently more than yourself

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by eldrick
                  Originally posted by Texas
                  Originally posted by eldrick
                  Originally posted by Texas
                  I have never even thought about a poll
                  exactly

                  you don't think
                  You do?
                  evidently more than yourself
                  Evidently not. You've shown us....zero! You've proven...zero! All you've accomplished is show just how much you don't know. Clownish would fit.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    this from the "intellectual" who believes a guy with only 10.09 ability can split a 10.12 curve ???

                    no

                    evidently you don't think

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by eldrick
                      this from the "intellectual" who believes a guy with only 10.09 ability can split a 10.12 curve ???

                      no

                      evidently you don't think
                      That from a guy who thinks a 10.09 guy who didn't even run the 100m in 1996 can beat the Olympic champion/9.84 sprinter...hahahaha!!!!!!! Yep you're a real Einstein alright.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        err...

                        a 10.03 guy's next race is 9.76 & then beats the 9.82 world champ in a 9.72wr

                        no

                        evidently you don't think...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by eldrick
                          err...

                          a 10.03 guy's next race is 9.76 & then beats the 9.82 world champ in a 9.72wr

                          no

                          evidently you don't think...
                          Don't tell me you're trying to compare Bolt to MJ as a 100m sprinter. MJ ran a handful of 100m most in that 10.12-10.20 world he was never going to be a 9.8 guy. Bolt is a whole different deal, not surprised you don't understand that.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            no

                            all that bolt did was to show us what he coud run for 100m when he did it seriously

                            mj didn't get to show us his 100 ability in '96 in 200 shape of his life, as plan all along was for 200/400, just as easily as bolt may have decided not to bother running 100m last year, rested on that 10.03 from '07 & just run 200s

                            if he hadn't bothered with that 9.76 "warm up" & just jogged a 20.1 instead, we may never have seen 9.69

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by eldrick
                              no

                              all that bolt did was to show us what he coud run for 100m when he did it seriously

                              mj didn't get to show us his 100 ability in '96 in 200 shape of his life, as plan all along was for 200/400, just as easily as bolt may have decided not to bother running 100m last year, rested on that 10.03 from '07 & just run 200s

                              if he hadn't bothered with that 9.76 "warm up" & just jogged a 20.1 instead, we may never have seen 9.69
                              MJ simply didn't have that blazin' type speed. He had "sustained" speed. He ran the curve of his life and did the best Beamonesque performance we've ever seen. He was not a 9.8 sprinter, he was a guy who ran "a" great curve.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X