Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1965: just some numbers

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1965: just some numbers

    Adolf Plummer 12x
    Claude Piquemal 11x
    Wolfgang Nordwig 16x
    Andrzej Badenski 11x
    Bill Crothers 11x
    Jan Kasal 16x
    Jurgen May 15x
    Jorma Kinnunen 31x
    Kipchoge Keino 15x
    Jurgen May 12x
    Blaine Lindgren `15x
    Jim Ryun 14x
    Alan Simpson 14x
    Bodo Tummler 14x
    Ron Clarke 12x
    Ludvik Danek 19x
    Kipchoge Keino 10x
    Marcel Duriez 12x
    George Anderson 13x
    Eddy Ottoz 13x
    Gerry Cerulla 11x
    Josef Oldlozil 15x
    Rex Cawley 10x
    John Cooper 11x
    Otis Burrell 12x
    Viktor Bolshov 11x
    Wolfgang Schillkowski 14x
    Bob Seagren 13x
    John Cramer 17x
    Jim Grelle 15x
    Ralph Boston 15x
    Ranier Stenius 18x
    Janusz Sidlo 24x
    Pentti Escola 13x
    Michael Sauer 15x
    Randy Matson 12x
    Tomas Jungwirth 16x
    John McGrath 12x
    Parry O’Brien 12x
    Uwe Beyer 21x
    Gyula Zsivotsky 18x

  • #2
    Got it - thanks.

    Comment


    • #3
      there IS some method to my madness ... I think ... granted my post might be somewhat obtuse. But I think it tells a tale

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 1965: just some numbers

        Originally posted by no one
        Jorma Kinnunen 31x
        Robo-thrower !!!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by no one
          there IS some method to my madness ... I think ... granted my post might be somewhat obtuse. But I think it tells a tale
          Yes, including the fact that 'Kipchoge Keino' and 'Jurgen May' were surprisingly common names back then...

          Comment


          • #6
            I have no idea. Is it the number of times each of these athletes competed in 1965?

            Comment


            • #7
              I give up too. ?????

              Comment


              • #8
                It's part of the answer of how Wilt Chamberlain got to 20,000 so easily :-)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by noone
                  I have no idea
                  Didn't you post it? Where did you find this?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    no one vs noone!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by gh
                      no one vs noone!
                      Who's on first?!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by gh
                        no one vs noone!
                        Ahh, good point. Certainly I have never noticed that distinction before.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Ok, will some one who gets it give us a clue what this is about?
                          no one has apparently overestimated our ability to appreciate a post that is obtuse to the point of obfuscation.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Daisy
                            Originally posted by gh
                            no one vs noone!
                            Ahh, good point. Certainly I have never noticed that distinction before.
                            Note that "no one" has out-posted me ("noone") exactly 2:1. No one could have predicted this coincidence.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by noone
                              Note that "no one" has out-posted me ("noone") exactly 2:1. No one could have predicted this coincidence.
                              One thing that no one can predict is the need for two more posts.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X