Prediction: no one can get this without looking it up like I did!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Big Event
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Here's our bio on Fowler from Olympedia - hence the clue about Newfoundland:
Bob Fowler was a native Newfoundlander, whose family emigrated to Boston, Massachusetts in 1898. He attended school at St. Bonaventure’s Collegiate in St. John’s, Newfoundland. Fowler ran for the Cambridgeport Gymnasium, first entering local races in 1901. He competed in multiple marathon races, finishing second at Boston in 1907, third in 1905, 1908, and fourth in 1911, and was called “The Ancient Marathoner” in the local Boston papers. On New Year’s Day 1909, Fowler won the Yonkers Marathon in 2-52:45.4, run mostly on the track, but in -18º C. (0º F.) weather, setting a world record for the marathon, although it lasted for only 41 days. Fowler has been listed as American in the records of the 1904 and 1906 Olympics for many years, but recent research reveals he did not become an American citizen until 16 September 1907, so should be listed as representing Newfoundland at the 1904 Olympic Games. His representation in 1906 can be argued although he was part of the first formal USA Team in Athens. After retiring from competition he was coach at Williams College before accepting an offer to coach the Brazilian Navy’s track athletes. He later worked as an electrician at the Boston Navy Yard.
Personal Bests: Mar – 2-52:45.4 (1909); Mar (short course) – 2-26:42 (1908).
Comment
-
Comment
-
As with many of DoubleRBar's questions, I gave up rather quickly on this one, but I use his puzzles to learn more about the sport.
One thing that struck me was how many marathons were run during this period. 50-60 years later there were only about three or four annual marathons in the U.S.
It seems there were two races within about a month of each other. On November 27, 1908 the Yonkers Marathon finished at the Empire City track in front of almost 20,000 spectators
The January 1, 1909 race was apparently billed as the Empire City Marathon, run in Yonkers.
What I am curious about is whether these races used the current race distance (noting that Boston was 24.5 miles until 1924).Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master403 View PostAs with many of DoubleRBar's questions, I gave up rather quickly on this one, but I use his puzzles to learn more about the sport.
One thing that struck me was how many marathons were run during this period. 50-60 years later there were only about three or four annual marathons in the U.S.
It seems there were two races within about a month of each other. On November 27, 1908 the Yonkers Marathon finished at the Empire City track in front of almost 20,000 spectators
The January 1, 1909 race was apparently billed as the Empire City Marathon, run in Yonkers.
What I am curious about is whether these races used the current race distance (noting that Boston was 24.5 miles until 1924).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master403 View PostAs with many of DoubleRBar's questions, I gave up rather quickly on this one, but I use his puzzles to learn more about the sport.
One thing that struck me was how many marathons were run during this period. 50-60 years later there were only about three or four annual marathons in the U.S.
It seems there were two races within about a month of each other. On November 27, 1908 the Yonkers Marathon finished at the Empire City track in front of almost 20,000 spectators
The January 1, 1909 race was apparently billed as the Empire City Marathon, run in Yonkers.
What I am curious about is whether these races used the current race distance (noting that Boston was 24.5 miles until 1924).
The earlier Yonkers Marathon (won by Jim Crowley in a faster time) was described in the New York Times as "about 26 miles", which is a vague enough description; of course, considering the measuring standards for road races in those days, the vagueness is fully appropriate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mcgato View PostWasn't the marathon distance standardized around 1921? Before that a marathon was some distance around 40K. Trying to figure out records with no set distance is folly.
But certainly the unreliable distances are something that always needs to be kept in mind, and it doesn't help that many races were reported contemporarily as "26 miles, 385 yards" that are considered short courses by statisticians today. Matthew Maloney, for instance, ran 2:36:26.2 a few days before Fowler; and the distance was reported in newspapers as 26 miles, 385 yards; but it tends to get the short-course treatment nowadays. Albert Michelsen's Port Chester win from 1925 was similarly reported as full-distance and even appears in the official IAAF world-best progression, but ARRS gives it as a 25-miler.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam1729 View PostThe best summary of the marathon craze of 1908-11, started by the interest in the 1908 Olympic marathon and Dorando Pietri, is in the book The Marathon Footrace by Dave Martin and Roger Gynn. Its about 35 years old but well worth the read. It has almost a full chapter on the years 1908-11
Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants
Comment
-
Dave was a great guy although I hadn't seen him in almost 25 years prior to his death. Strangely, he was not only an expert on distance running and training, but also on the high jump. I asked him how that came to be and he could never really explain it. Just happened. He had a very, gravelly, almost raspy voice, that Pete Cava and I used to imitate all the time and he would laugh his head off when we did it.
Comment
Comment