Originally posted by Olli
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Karelian I.
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
No. Sizable parts of Finland (most of the province of Karelia and some smaller northern areas) had to be ceded to the Soviet Union according to the peace treaty. These parts are still part of Russia. Otherwise, they never occupied any parts of Finland except for the leasing of two small naval bases (Hanko in 1940–1941 and Porkkala in 1948–1956).
In fact, Finland is one of the few countries in Europe that were never occupied by foreign forces during WWII.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OlliSizable parts of Finland (most of the province of Karelia and some smaller northern areas) had to be ceded to the Soviet Union"A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
I answered to your later question: "Didn't the Soviet Union occupy a sizable strip of Finland for a few years?" That never happened. We lost a "sizable strip" for good. (By the way, that "strip" was not even entirely conquered in the war, but it had to be ceded under the harsh peace treaty.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Olli View PostI answered to your later question: "Didn't the Soviet Union occupy a sizable strip of Finland for a few years?" That never happened. We lost a "sizable strip" for good. (By the way, that "strip" was not even entirely conquered in the war, but it had to be ceded under the harsh peace treaty.)"A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
Originally posted by Olli View PostBy the way, if you said you read the Wikipedia article about Winter War, you might have noticed a caption above the first picture which says "Part of World War II." And as far as I can see, there is no rationale to think otherwise.
Comment
Comment