Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

    The thread was locked, because some posters used sexist language (or so I understand). I'll attempt to answer the questions posted in straight fashion. As some questions are provocative and sarcastic, some answers might venture into those regions as well.

    1. Would white people hate OJ as much if he'd been accused of killing his first wife...who was black?

    I don't "hate" OJ. I still laugh at Naked Gun movies. And the answer is "yes", it would not matter to me, if the murdered people were green or orange.

    2. Why are 70% of black children born out of wedlock? Have black women ever heard of marriage?

    Women? What about those fathers? They don't share equal responsibility?

    3. Why do we accomodate the hispanic people who wont learn english?

    What bothers me a lot more is all those English speakers on this message board that are unable to produce one coherent sentence.

    4. Why do white males always deny that any issue of alleged discrimination exists...unless its reverse?

    Some do, some don't. I don't. I also see discrimination against all sorts of people, based on race, religion, sex, sexual orientation...

    5. Since being gay isnt a gender...isnt it just an inordinate lust?

    Neither. It is sexual orientation of complex and varied causes.

    6. Doesn't being gay stand against the natural order of things to procreate? And therefore opposes the sustenance of the familial infrastructure of mankind and consequently the species? Is it rational to support that?

    Not discriminating against the homosexuals and allowing them their chosen lifestyle is no skin off the heterosexual noses, nor does it equate "support". There is plenty procreation in this world, as you have pointed out above. That the homosexuals threaten the "family structure" is one of the most absurd, unsupportable statements out there.

    7. Why do so many black men not have anything to do with the children they sire?

    Just as #2. Irresponsible? You tell me.

    8. Why do black men leave the house in do- rags?

    No clue.

    9. If you get a tattoo to be set apart or be an individual...arent you really just being like everyone else who has one? Isnt the only way you're special and set apart is if you dont get one? Isnt there only one you?

    I have never comrehended needs for tattoos either.

    10. If you get type II diabetes...isnt that self inflicted?

    Some are, some are not. Just like hypertension and ruined knees.

    11. Do white people feel that blacks will one day try and return the favor?

    I won't engage in a vitriolic race wars debate.

    12. When white people get really fat they will be an outcast in their family and community... even to the point of suicide. If black people get really fat their family still loves them.

    Total nonsense.

    13. Why do black people wash their cars so much? Why do white people leave theirs dirty?

    Total nonsense #2.

    14. Why are black people mocked for liking chicken and watermelon? Are asian people criticized for eating sushi?

    I like chicken and watermelon, I don't like sushi. What does that make me?

    15. Why can hispanic people name their kids Jose and Maria...white folks name their kids Tyler and Samantha...but black people be crucified because they didnt?

    Total nonsense #3.

    15. Why is it illegal to harm an unborn eagle (egg), but legal to abort an unborn child?

    Two completely separate questions. We can debate needs for conservation in nature, we can debate reproductive rights of women.
    "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
    by Thomas Henry Huxley

  • #2
    Pretty good effort Pego.

    I would've preferred that you answer all the questions, though, since none are nonsense as you labeled them.

    For example...you are far more likely to be ostrasized culturally if you are a white person who is overweight than if you are a black or hispanic person who's overweight. Maybe because of that, white people are proportionately less likely to be overweight? I'm not sure.

    The reason I know and you dont? Because most black people who attain any measure of success must negotiate two cultures: the dominant culture and their own. White people in general don't have to bother learning anything about black people beyond what they see on TV. Black people dont control anything. But all minorities hoping to meld into society and gain a measure of acceptance and success must learn to manage at least two. Therefore I can tell you from a lifelong experience that black people who are fat dont suffer the same degree of cultural rejection that white people who are fat do.

    Black people have traditionally been criticized and mocked for liking chicken and watermelon while other cultures suffer no such stereotypical condemnation for what they like to eat. You answered the question as though your personal approach speaks to the general issue and it doesnt.

    The point of the abortion question was to show that for whatever reason the life of a bird is considered more precious than human life. Period. And its sad.
    The fool has said...there is no God. Psa 14

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by TrackDaddy
      the life of a bird is considered more precious than human life. Period. And its sad.
      I know I'm going to be really, really sorry, I'm writing this, but . . . some would argue that an abortion doesn't end a 'human life'. It ends the possibility of one, precisely the way contraception does. I personally am not FOR abortion, but I AM for a woman's right to self-determination.

      This is not an invitation to debate what a 'human life' is, becuase that is, of course, the crux of the matter. An early miscarriage is also the 'death' of a person, yet there are very few funerals for that. That a basic rite (sic) we do for all we care about, why not in this case?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by TrackDaddy
        .....
        Black people have traditionally been criticized and mocked for liking chicken and watermelon while other cultures suffer no such stereotypical condemnation for what they like to eat. ...
        You've never heard of "beaners" or "rice boys"?

        (old Lee Trevino joke: you know why us Mexicans don't do BBQ? The beans fall through the grill")

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

          Originally posted by Pego
          5. Since being gay isnt a gender...isnt it just an inordinate lust?

          Neither. It is sexual orientation of complex and varied causes.
          inordinate lust IMHO.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by gh
            Originally posted by TrackDaddy
            .....
            Black people have traditionally been criticized and mocked for liking chicken and watermelon while other cultures suffer no such stereotypical condemnation for what they like to eat. ...
            You've never heard of "beaners" or "rice boys"?

            (old Lee Trevino joke: you know why us Mexicans don't do BBQ? The beans fall through the grill")
            ...and krauts :wink: .
            "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
            by Thomas Henry Huxley

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TrackDaddy
              Black people have traditionally been criticized and mocked for liking chicken and watermelon while other cultures suffer no such stereotypical condemnation for what they like to eat.
              Lutefisk, anyone?

              Comment


              • #8
                Limeys.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Mackerel Snappers

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackerel_Snapper

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

                    Originally posted by Dutra
                    Originally posted by Pego
                    5. Since being gay isnt a gender...isnt it just an inordinate lust?

                    Neither. It is sexual orientation of complex and varied causes.
                    inordinate lust IMHO.
                    Well, I suppose you can call a sexual orientation 'lust', but what's inordinate about being gay?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      now wanting to fuck sheep, that's inordinate!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by gh
                        now wanting to fuck sheep, that's inordinate!
                        Bestiaphobe. Don't you know they are born that way? It's not a choice!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by gm
                          Originally posted by gh
                          now wanting to fuck sheep, that's inordinate!
                          Bestiaphobe. Don't you know they are born that way? It's not a choice!
                          The sheep??

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

                            Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
                            Originally posted by Dutra
                            Originally posted by Pego
                            5. Since being gay isnt a gender...isnt it just an inordinate lust?

                            Neither. It is sexual orientation of complex and varied causes.
                            inordinate lust IMHO.
                            Well, I suppose you can call a sexual orientation 'lust', but what's inordinate about being gay?
                            I think a man attracted to another man or a woman attracted to another woman is an extension of all tendencies within the sexual realm. If that doesn't fall under "lust" then so be it. In other words, it's a further extension on a sexual fetish.

                            The sexual fetish is what drives the sexual orientation.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Answers to TrackDaddy's Politically incorrect.

                              Originally posted by Dutra
                              Originally posted by AthleticsInBritain
                              Originally posted by Dutra
                              Originally posted by Pego
                              5. Since being gay isnt a gender...isnt it just an inordinate lust?

                              Neither. It is sexual orientation of complex and varied causes.
                              inordinate lust IMHO.
                              Well, I suppose you can call a sexual orientation 'lust', but what's inordinate about being gay?
                              I think a man attracted to another man or a woman attracted to another woman is an extension of all tendencies within the sexual realm. If that doesn't fall under "lust" then so be it. In other words, it's a further extension on a sexual fetish.

                              The sexual fetish is what drives the sexual orientation.
                              So assuming you're a straight male, presumably you have a fetish for women?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X