I am still trying to understand why if someone has used PEDs or has strong accusations (and we have a source) that we can't mention it on the message boards. For example, if I say Udo Beyer's marks are not legit because he used PEDs (http://thinksteroids.com/forum/steroid- ... 34766.html), I get either removed or suspended. I am not making stuff up or throwing out random accusations, these are referenced.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PED References
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Re: PED References
The accusations may be referenced, but AFAIK he's never admitted PED use, nor was he ever found guilty of a doping violation by any authority. The fact that a suspicion has made its way into print somewhere does not make it more than a suspicion. And the moderators here, wisely IMHO, have banned statements and innuendos based on suspicions, rather than established, proven, facts.
-
Re: PED References
The accusations may be referenced, but AFAIK he's never admitted PED use, nor was he ever found guilty of a doping violation by any authority
You don't want random people accusing you of something without ACTUAL PROOF of wrong-doing, do you?
Comment
-
Re: PED References
Originally posted by dbirdsThe accusations may be referenced, but AFAIK he's never admitted PED use, nor was he ever found guilty of a doping violation by any authority
Comment
-
Re: PED References
He did tandfman
GH, sorry I believe in fair play and hate to see athletes cheated by drug users! IMO Felix and Cantwell among other should have WRs if it wasn't for drug users. I feel the same way about Maris and Ruth in baseball. I don't see any legal issue bc other message boards allow it. Just looking for clarification.
Comment
Comment