So Google has bid over a $bil for Youtube. Mark Cuban sez it's a 'moronic' business move, because so much of what's on Youtube is copyright infringement. Limewire moves merrily along in Napster's footsteps. The idea that the internet is 'free' and we should all be 'entitled' to up/download anything we wish is fraught with legal issues. Only the brave, deep-pocketed people are trying to 'protect' their 'property' on the web. So where is this all headed? If Google is willing to spend this much money on a blatantly 'illegal' commodity, that tells us they are betting BigBux that copyright will be a thing of the past. Is this a good thing? Yes, no, maybe so. Discuss.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Google, Youtube, Napster, Limewire, etc.
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
What percentage of YouTuber:s are uploading illegal videos? I:ve used the service twice, and have both times uploaded personal videos.
I:d like to see the world go to a purchase-direct scenario where I can review a programme and pay for x-amount of seconds/minutes of download time. I would like to pay "x" kronor for program access, and "y" kronor for the amount of minutes I:d like to record. If there is a 2-hour track and field programme on an internet site, and I:d like to record the 400m, I:d like the 45 seconds or so to be reduced from my total credits.
Comment
-
Originally posted by polevaultpowerOriginally posted by EPelleWhat percentage of YouTuber:s are uploading illegal videos? I:ve used the service twice, and have both times uploaded personal videos.
Comment
-
On the broader issue, technology has allowed people to steal licensed materials for years, and people who are otherwise law abiding folks think nothing of making a copy of a friend’s CD. Before that there was tape, but CDs are much easier, cheaper and much maintains the source’s true fidelity.
As for YouTube, apparently they are taking steps to address the licensing issues:
The deal came on the heels of a separate announcement by YouTube Monday that it had signed licensing deals with Universal Music Group, CBS and Sony BMG Music Entertainment. The deals, which will allow YouTube users to post licensed content, will give the media companies a share of the video site's advertising revenue and should prevent lawsuits against YouTube, at least from the companies covered by the deals.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... LM06H1.DTL
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaisyThat won't stop the law dudes from closing down YouTube.
$1,600,000,000
that law dudes WON'T go after them (the licensing agreements notwithstanding; they represent a very small portion of the copyrighted material that currently resides on YouTube)!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaisyOriginally posted by polevaultpowerOriginally posted by EPelleWhat percentage of YouTuber:s are uploading illegal videos? I:ve used the service twice, and have both times uploaded personal videos.
Of course, the licensing agreement(s) do reduce the headaches, and most artists realize the benefits of exposure on a site like YouTube. Sharing video files is not quite the same as audio files from a financial standpoint.There are no strings on me
Comment
Comment