Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

what happened here?

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Jaws!

    "We're gonna need a bigger boat!"Forget the "Clear", I think it was the plutonium.

    Comment


    • #32
      John, where Jim had had 'had had', had 'had', had had 'had had' been the right answer.

      That, that is, is. That, that is not, is not. That is so, is it not? It is so!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by tafnut
        John, where Jim had had 'had had', had 'had', had had 'had had' been the right answer.
        John, where Jim had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had been the right answer.

        Got to have the right answer being "had had" because there are two occurrences of the right answer and only one of the incorrect answer.

        Comment


        • #34
          Wrongo, TOE: :lol:

          That that is, is. That that is not, is not. That is so, is it not? It is so.

          Edit: even your first edits did not fix it!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by bad hammy
            Wrongo, TOE: :lol:

            That that is, is. That that is not, is not. That is so, is it not? It is so.
            ha, ha, I edited before you put the answer up!!! (actually I was in mid-edit)

            Comment


            • #36
              You never know who's watching these boards. :P

              http://tinyurl.com/2wc7ny
              There are no strings on me

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by MJR
                Just wondering if this is related to the Clear or the Cream

                ..... filled donut, that is...
                that and those beer curls....is there a WADA test for these items? :lol:

                Comment


                • #38
                  It's an epidemic!





                  K E N
                  K E N

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re:

                    Originally posted by 26mi235
                    Originally posted by tafnut
                    John, where Jim had had 'had had', had 'had', had had 'had had' been the right answer.
                    John, where Jim had had "had", had had "had had". "Had had" had been the right answer.
                    Got to have the right answer being "had had" because there are two occurrences of the right answer and only one of the incorrect answer.
                    New (grammatically correct) sentence to parse:

                    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: what happened here?

                      You rang, sir?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X