Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lock of the weekend

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    GB fumbled twice in 90 seconds-record? :lol:

    14 zip and at this rate Seahawks win 100-0 :lol: :lol: :lol:
    hip hip hooray !!!

    the squaxter is back after 3 months jail for walking on the cracks in the pavement whilst wearing a loud shirt

    Comment


    • #17
      21 unanswered GB pts! This MAY be worse than Texas even imagined!!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Favre thrives under pressure. An understatement of great proportions.

        Comment


        • #19
          There's just something really cool about watching football in the snow.
          https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

          Comment


          • #20
            Bret is almost sacked, stumbles.. falls forward, gains his balance and lobs the ball perfectly for a first down. I just saw true greatness.
            phsstt!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by SQUACKEE
              Bret is almost sacked, stumbles.. falls forward, gains his balance and lobs the ball perfectly for a first down. I just saw true greatness.
              Or luck :P
              https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by guru
                Originally posted by SQUACKEE
                Bret is almost sacked, stumbles.. falls forward, gains his balance and lobs the ball perfectly for a first down. I just saw true greatness.
                Or luck :P
                Hey, he practises these plays all the time. :lol:

                Comment


                • #23
                  Tex may be a bull in a china shop but he know his football.
                  phsstt!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
                    Tex may be a bull in a china shop but he know his football.
                    I agree - you can stick a fork in this one. It wasn't gutsy to pick the win, but it was to GUARANTEE it in writing. Good on ya, Tex. I don't think my Jags will fare much better. I'm already starting to feel a frog in my throat for tomorrow! :wink:

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by tafnut
                      I don't think my Jags will fare much better.
                      Not so fast. I think that may very well be the upset special of the weekend. The Patriots defense, especially their line, has looked very ordinary the last month. If Garrard doesn't make any huge mistakes, and this is key, whoa nelly.
                      https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        The Packers looked good. I am happy 8) .
                        "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
                        by Thomas Henry Huxley

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          OK, golf it is!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Yep, Garrard needed to be perfect and he wasn't. He was good, but a fumble and INT is all the Pats need when Brady goes 24-26, and the two incompletes were drops. It's just scary how good NE's O-Line is in pass protection.
                            https://twitter.com/walnuthillstrak

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              It was a pretty easy pick actually. Who had the Seahawks beat ..."on the road"..in 2007? Try nobody! They didn't beat one playoff team as roadwarriors. They are stricky a home team. Once they leave Seattle they become very, very average. GB went 3-1 vs playoff teams. Now add the Favre factor and we have exactly what we saw.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by guru
                                Yep, Garrard needed to be perfect and he wasn't. He was good, but a fumble and INT is all the Pats need when Brady goes 24-26, and the two incompletes were drops. It's just scary how good NE's O-Line is in pass protection.
                                I thought Garrard was very very good and when he runs with those little tiny strides he's deceptively fast. Brady usually had time but its Still amazing how he hits a moving bullseye EVERYTIME.
                                phsstt!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X