Originally posted by observer2
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dwain Chambers [Golden League reprieve?]
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
I really should have done some research, I've just had a quick look through the GL results and I can't find anyone who has served a 2 year ban on any of the results sheets! :shock: Kapachinskaya, Maggi, Cherry.....none of them were ever even present. :idea:
This is a huge step that I completely missed. Of course, some might say it just makes it worse when these branded athletes are not wanted on the circuit but can gladly go to the biggest competition on earth and take the gold (back to Brazil).
Comment
-
Originally posted by JaackI really should have done some research, I've just had a quick look through the GL results and I can't find anyone who has served a 2 year ban on any of the results sheets! :shock: Kapachinskaya, Maggi, Cherry.....none of them were ever even present. :idea:
This is a huge step that I completely missed. Of course, some might say it just makes it worse when these branded athletes are not wanted on the circuit but can gladly go to the biggest competition on earth and take the gold (back to Brazil).i deserve extra credit
Comment
-
News
Managers group won’t represent athletes who’ve been banned
13.11.2007
MIAMI BEACH (Nov. 9, 2007) –An agreement has been reached by the Association of Athletics Managers (AAM) that its members will not represent any athlete who tests positive and is convicted of a doping violation for which he or she serves a two-year ban or longer. It is believed to be one of the first such agreements in any sport.
Details
European meetings will continue in the policy and not invite athletes with doping past
12.10.2007
EuroMeetings Press Release: MALTA, Oct 11 – Euromeetings are continuing in tough anti-doping measures and urged the member meetings not to invite athletes who could harm the events with their doping offences from the past. As already said in March at Spring Meeting in Birmingham also now at the General Assembly during European Calendar Conference in Malta athletes who could cause negative publicity should not be invited to take part.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mump boyOriginally posted by JaackI really should have done some research, I've just had a quick look through the GL results and I can't find anyone who has served a 2 year ban on any of the results sheets! :shock: Kapachinskaya, Maggi, Cherry.....none of them were ever even present. :idea:
This is a huge step that I completely missed. Of course, some might say it just makes it worse when these branded athletes are not wanted on the circuit but can gladly go to the biggest competition on earth and take the gold (back to Brazil).
Comment
-
Originally posted by JaackOriginally posted by mump boyOriginally posted by JaackI really should have done some research, I've just had a quick look through the GL results and I can't find anyone who has served a 2 year ban on any of the results sheets! :shock: Kapachinskaya, Maggi, Cherry.....none of them were ever even present. :idea:
This is a huge step that I completely missed. Of course, some might say it just makes it worse when these branded athletes are not wanted on the circuit but can gladly go to the biggest competition on earth and take the gold (back to Brazil).i deserve extra credit
Comment
-
Maggi won Gold so I guess that was good enough to ignore her previous record and have her jump. If Dwain had been from another country and medalled in Beijing, I wonder if they'd have let him race?
What I think is more likely is that the comments he made on the BBC are likely to haunt him for the rest of his career.
Comment
-
The interesting thing for me about Chambers' 6.42 is that he never used to be THAT great a starter...his finish was always the stronger part of his race back in ye good old days- indeed, in that 6.42 he appeared to be going away from the field.
Yes, it doesn't always translate, but he's hardly built for the 60m. I expect great things over the summer...whether I like them or not!
Comment
Comment