Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Short video about....humanity
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
I think that's what you were supposed to think. One of the points of the thing, I think, is that people aren't always what they appear to be. Not all guys in suits are heartless and greedy, even if they are capitalists, which he might have been. (From his appearance, one also might have guessed that he was a contract assassin.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by tandfmanI think that's what you were supposed to think. One of the points of the thing, I think, is that people aren't always what they appear to be. Not all guys in suits are heartless and greedy, even if they are capitalists, which he might have been. (From his appearance, one also might have guessed that he was a contract assassin.)
Did you notice that he did not give the man any money but just the means by which society would be more freely able to give him what he needs. Thereby making society better off all around. Like the founders of America they believed that a free society would not work if there was alack of moral restraint - not goverment restraint.
Comment
-
Originally posted by proofs in the pudd'inDid you notice that he did not give the man any money
Comment
-
Originally posted by tandfmanThe other possible message there is that charity is more likely to be motivated by guilt than by pity.
Money, Gun, ???
Comment
-
Originally posted by tandfmanOriginally posted by proofs in the pudd'inLike the founders of America they believed that a free society would not work if there was alack of moral restraint - not goverment restraint.
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798
Comment
-
Or how about Ben Frank:
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787
All those liberals on CNN, MSNBC, ect. would be sh*** their pants if someone said that today. :lol:
Comment
-
Originally posted by proofs in the pudd'inOr how about Ben Frank:
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787
All those liberals on CNN, MSNBC, ect. would be sh*** their pants if someone said that today. :lol:
Speaking of stereotypes...
Good way to sully a nice thread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrianOriginally posted by proofs in the pudd'inOr how about Ben Frank:
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787
All those liberals on CNN, MSNBC, ect. would be sh*** their pants if someone said that today. :lol:
Speaking of stereotypes...
Good way to sully a nice thread.
Comment
Comment