Being right or wrong has nothing to do with it.... it has to do with being a rude and dismissive megalomaniac who rewrites the same thread(s) over and over and over, providing an organic alternative to Ambien.
You also alienate people, plain and simple. My best advice is that you should simply be ignored, since unlike your alter ego Brutal at least you've tuned it down enough to avoid an outright banning.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OU is the #1 ranked football team of all time
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bambamOriginally posted by TexasOriginally posted by ghI'll be sure to ask the next time I'm having trouble falling asleep
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TexasOriginally posted by ghI'll be sure to ask the next time I'm having trouble falling asleep
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ghI'll be sure to ask the next time I'm having trouble falling asleep
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ghOriginally posted by Texas... I have kept up with USC over the years since without them west coast football sucks :cry:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Texas... I have kept up with USC over the years since without them west coast football sucks :cry:
Leave a comment:
-
That looks like a seriously flawed points system to me. Which would, of course, be consistent with college football.
Let's look at a typical team that wins the national championship and the points that they receive:
25 for national championship
10 for major bowl berth
10 for major bowl win
10 for best conference win/loss
10?? for AP top 5 ranking (I'm not sure they get this as well as national championship)
3 for bowl appearance
3 for bowl win
2 for 10 win season
73 points total. Florida would have received the 73 points this year, but Oklahoma would have only received 35 points from that list. I don't think Florida's season should represent twice the points of Oklahoma's. And I'm a Gator alum.
Other flaws include Virginia Tech beating Cincinnati in a "major" Orange Bowl this year, when neither was a top 10 team. Also half of Div I gets to a bowl in this day and age.
I think focusing on the final rankings would be a better way to do things, since it is basically a composite of most of the things that they include. Then find a way to add some bonus points for the Heisman, #1 draft picks, etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TexasOriginally posted by Dietmar239I initially included championships that they actually went in and won the bowl, as I mentioned. However, they are recognized for 16. I believe that was in the Title Years by Polling line that I included above. Notre Dame has more than anyone. How would you rank them?
I'd have to start in the 60's when will started seeing a lot of change in athlectics. I confess however that I'd have to do my homework to come up with anything meaningful there. I have kept up with USC over the years since without them west coast football sucks :cry:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dietmar239I initially included championships that they actually went in and won the bowl, as I mentioned. However, they are recognized for 16. I believe that was in the Title Years by Polling line that I included above. Notre Dame has more than anyone. How would you rank them?
I'd have to start in the 60's when will started seeing a lot of change in athlectics. I confess however that I'd have to do my homework to come up with anything meaningful there. I have kept up with USC over the years since without them west coast football sucks :cry:
Leave a comment:
-
I initially included championships that they actually went in and won the bowl, as I mentioned. However, they are recognized for 16. I believe that was in the Title Years by Polling line that I included above. Notre Dame has more than anyone. How would you rank them?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dietmar239Originally posted by TexasOriginally posted by Dietmar239I thought the bottom line was national championships (16 vs 11)? You are too much!! :lol:
USC has had more great players, more Heisman winners and have beaten up on the Sooners when they have played. I think I'll go with that.
The NCAA does not conduct a national championship in Division I-A football and is not involved in the selection process.
Since 1998, the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) operated jointly by the ACC, Southeastern, Big 12, Big East, Big Ten and Pacific-10 Conferences has used a ranking system to determine the number one and number two teams at the end of the season.
Various organizations have named National Champions in college football since 1869. Utilizing the selectors as recognized by the NCAA, Oklahoma has been recognized for 16 different seasons: 2003, 2000, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1978, 1975, 1974, 1973, 1967, 1956, 1955, 1953, 1950 and 1949.
USC beats Oklahoma when they meet they have also had the better players. You can also make a case that they play a tougher schedule and have for a long time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TexasOriginally posted by Dietmar239I thought the bottom line was national championships (16 vs 11)? You are too much!! :lol:
USC has had more great players, more Heisman winners and have beaten up on the Sooners when they have played. I think I'll go with that.
The NCAA does not conduct a national championship in Division I-A football and is not involved in the selection process.
Since 1998, the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) operated jointly by the ACC, Southeastern, Big 12, Big East, Big Ten and Pacific-10 Conferences has used a ranking system to determine the number one and number two teams at the end of the season.
Various organizations have named National Champions in college football since 1869. Utilizing the selectors as recognized by the NCAA, Oklahoma has been recognized for 16 different seasons: 2003, 2000, 1986, 1985, 1980, 1978, 1975, 1974, 1973, 1967, 1956, 1955, 1953, 1950 and 1949.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dietmar239I thought the bottom line was national championships (16 vs 11)? You are too much!! :lol:
USC has had more great players, more Heisman winners and have beaten up on the Sooners when they have played. I think I'll go with that.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought the bottom line was national championships (16 vs 11)? You are too much!! :lol:
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: