Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rename: Ghazal Omid on the Iranian Revolution

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    Also, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
    Only those who were not paying attention. This is exactly what he said he would do.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by bad hammy
      Originally posted by SQUACKEE
      Also, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
      Only those who were not paying attention. This is exactly what he said he would do.
      Precisely.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by bad hammy
        Originally posted by SQUACKEE
        Also, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
        Only those who were not paying attention. This is exactly what he said he would do.
        I agree, i was just making a point about one party being a warmonger.
        phsstt!

        Comment


        • #49
          As long as the clerics control Iran the only hope is for relaxed oppression. They will still have an Islamic theocracy but some mullahs are less medieval than others. Much of the human rights abuse is personal prejudice, not supported by Islam.
          There are some Mullahs who openly advocate separation of "church" and state. Unfortunately, most are in political prison.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by bad hammy
            Originally posted by SQUACKEE
            Also, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
            Only those who were not paying attention. This is exactly what he said he would do.
            Exactly! He campaigned on doing just that.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by lonewolf
              As long as the clerics control Iran the only hope is for relaxed oppression. They will still have an Islamic theocracy but some mullahs are less medieval than others. Much of the human rights abuse is personal prejudice, not supported by Islam.
              There are some Mullahs who openly advocate separation of "church" and state. Unfortunately, most are in political prison.
              Do you think that if Khatami had had his way when he was President, that he would have transformed Iran's theocracy into a government that most Iranians would have been content with?

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by jazzcyclist
                Originally posted by lonewolf
                As long as the clerics control Iran the only hope is for relaxed oppression. They will still have an Islamic theocracy but some mullahs are less medieval than others. Much of the human rights abuse is personal prejudice, not supported by Islam.
                There are some Mullahs who openly advocate separation of "church" and state. Unfortunately, most are in political prison.
                Do you think that if Khatami had had his way when he was President, that he would have transformed Iran's theocracy into a government that most Iranians would have been content with?
                Iranians consider Khatami less oppressive than Khamenei . While Ahmadinijad is just a mouthpiece for the theocracy, he is also a true zealot and, if one believes his rhetoic, a dangerous man.

                Comment

                Working...
                X