Originally posted by jazzcyclist
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rename: Ghazal Omid on the Iranian Revolution
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by lonewolfAs long as the clerics control Iran the only hope is for relaxed oppression. They will still have an Islamic theocracy but some mullahs are less medieval than others. Much of the human rights abuse is personal prejudice, not supported by Islam.
There are some Mullahs who openly advocate separation of "church" and state. Unfortunately, most are in political prison.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bad hammyOriginally posted by SQUACKEEAlso, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
Leave a comment:
-
As long as the clerics control Iran the only hope is for relaxed oppression. They will still have an Islamic theocracy but some mullahs are less medieval than others. Much of the human rights abuse is personal prejudice, not supported by Islam.
There are some Mullahs who openly advocate separation of "church" and state. Unfortunately, most are in political prison.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bad hammyOriginally posted by SQUACKEEAlso, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bad hammyOriginally posted by SQUACKEEAlso, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SQUACKEEAlso, there are many on the left that are outraged that Obama is increasing the U.S. military fighting in Afganistan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jazzcyclistRafsanjani finally speaks out.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... QD99G4MD80
Something I've been thinking about is what would the neocons and Likudniks do if the trio of Rafsanjani, Khatami and Mousavi are successful at having new elections held and having Mousavi win the Presidency, or even better, have Khamenei removed from power and replaced with someone to their liking. There likely won't be any difference between that governemnt and the current one when it comes to the nuclear issue, but can the warmongers turn around and demonize a government that they have been championing?
Leave a comment:
-
Rafsanjani finally speaks out.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... QD99G4MD80
Something I've been thinking about is what would the neocons and Likudniks do if the trio of Rafsanjani, Khatami and Mousavi are successful at having new elections held and having Mousavi win the Presidency, or even better, have Khamenei removed from power and replaced with someone to their liking. There likely won't be any difference between that governemnt and the current one when it comes to the nuclear issue, but can the warmongers turn around and demonize a government that they have been championing?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lonewolfI posted this on the now locked Iran revolution precipice forum but I don't think it violates any guidelines to inform that the next rumble will be July 9.
Leave a comment:
-
I posted this on the now locked Iran revolution precipice forum but I don't think it violates any guidelines to inform that the next rumble will be July 9.
Leave a comment:
-
This story may not be over yet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/world ... an.html?hp
Leading Clerics Defy Ayatollah on Disputed Iran Election
CAIRO — The most important group of religious leaders in Iran called the disputed presidential election and the new government illegitimate on Saturday, an act of defiance against the country’s supreme leader and the most public sign of a major split in the country’s clerical establishment.
...
“This crack in the clerical establishment, and the fact they are siding with the people and Moussavi, in my view is the most historic crack in the 30 years of the Islamic republic,†said Abbas Milani, director of the Iranian Studies Program at Stanford University. “Remember, they are going against an election verified and sanctified by Khamenei.â€
...
Since the election, the bulk of the clerical establishment in the holy city of Qum, an important religious and political center of power, has remained largely silent, leaving many to wonder when, or if, the nation’s most senior religious leaders would jump into the controversy that has posed the most significant challenge to the country’s leadership since the Islamic Revolution.
With its statement Saturday, the association of clerics — formed under the leadership of the revolution’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini — came down squarely on the side of the reform movement.
...
Leave a comment:
-
It would appear that 2009 is destined to go down as another one of those pivotal years in Iran's history, similar to 1953 and 1979. At least that's how former President Mohammad Khatami sees it. I wonder how different things might look in Iran and in the Mideast today if we had left their government alone in 1953.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BillVolHow do you know Ghazal, lone?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: