double your fun at Oscar time

[Flumpy]

And pretty much everyone agrees that The Dark Knight shoulda been there last year. Watched it again last night, and I can't get over how superb the film-making was, from cinematography to sound to lighting to editing to directing to acting to writing to special effects, etc., etc.. Your results will vary. :roll:

"Technical merits" aside, then there are those of us who thought it was such a piece of crap that they walked out in the middle.

I second that, although I did finish watching it just to see if it could continue to be quite so awful until the very end.

It did.

10 noms is a horrible idea. Not only that but they've bumped the Honorary Awards to a completely separate ceremony to make way for it :x

[dal4018]

And pretty much everyone agrees that The Dark Knight shoulda been there last year. Watched it again last night, and I can't get over how superb the film-making was, from cinematography to sound to lighting to editing to directing to acting to writing to special effects, etc., etc.. Your results will vary. :roll:

"Technical merits" aside, then there are those of us who thought it was such a piece of crap that they walked out in the middle.

That's perfectly OK. I have walked out of Oscar winners also, but at least I understood why they deserved Oscars. Hollywood has a long history of stinkers (no appreciable audience) that have won.

Yes I know Spike Lee's still upset about "Driving For Miss Daisy" winning the Oscar for best picture in '89 over his flick "Do The Right Thing"

[Marlow]

And pretty much everyone agrees that The Dark Knight shoulda been there last year. Watched it again last night, and I can't get over how superb the film-making was, from cinematography to sound to lighting to editing to directing to acting to writing to special effects, etc., etc.. Your results will vary. :roll:

"Technical merits" aside, then there are those of us who thought it was such a piece of crap that they walked out in the middle.

That's perfectly OK. I have walked out of Oscar winners also, but at least I understood why they deserved Oscars. Hollywood has a long history of stinkers (no appreciable audience) that have won.

[gh]

And pretty much everyone agrees that The Dark Knight shoulda been there last year. Watched it again last night, and I can't get over how superb the film-making was, from cinematography to sound to lighting to editing to directing to acting to writing to special effects, etc., etc.. Your results will vary. :roll:

"Technical merits" aside, then there are those of us who thought it was such a piece of crap that they walked out in the middle.

[Double R Bar]

"The Greatest Show on Earth" in 1952? Not what you might think of as the "Best Picture of the Year".

[Marlow]

And pretty much everyone agrees that The Dark Knight shoulda been there last year. Watched it again last night, and I can't get over how superb the film-making was, from cinematography to sound to lighting to editing to directing to acting to writing to special effects, etc., etc.. Your results will vary. :roll:

[gh]

back to 10 nominees for best movie

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... 18DASF.DTL