Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A warning to anyone who might go see Bruno

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gh
    replied
    TrackDaddy, enjoy a week's vacation, and while you're there, reconsider chucking your religious views into everything. You've already caused the locking down of two threads.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackDaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    Originally posted by Flumpy
    Well this is quite the stupidest thread to appear on T&FN for a long time.

    As someone who has seen the film and found it hilarious if completely contrived I can tell you all that the penis scene lasts for about 20 seconds and is amongst the funniest in the film.

    Calling it a 'gay penis movie' as about as correct as calling E.T. a monster movie about bicycles.
    Or the movie The Graduate is about having sex with older woman, Cougar's gone wild.

    Because i started this stoopid thread and it's gone places i never invisioned i want to make my position, as Nixon would say, very clear.

    99% of all my posts are looking for humor, sometimes falling horribly. I have nothing against the male body, i think it's beautiful. My own penis has brought me great joy and has rarely let me down.

    I do think it's funny/sad that a straight guy is so horrified by a naked man that he runs from the theatre screaming ahhhh, im not gay, ahhhhhh!

    I dont like seeing sex scenes in movies when i feel they aren't neccesary, sometimes they are. It sounds like Bruno needed to show cock to make the bit work, that's cool. To each his own. Do not judge others lest you be judged. He who is without penis cast the........forget that one.
    Squackee...

    Look what you started. :lol:

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackDaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by The Atheist
    It's sad the effect taking the word of The Bible literally, letter for letter, can have on a person. TrackDaddy is doing a good job of demonstrating this right here in this thread.

    Can you imagine if I was part of some religion, let's call it Zoinkianity, that had it's own religious text, which was said to have been written by Zod (the God the people of the Zoinkian religion believed in let's say) and in the text it said that it was written by Zod, therefore, if the book says it was written by Zod, then it MUST be true! There's no way some random smart person who a desire to have control over a lot of people could have possibly written it himself, and merely PRETENDED it had been written by Zos, and tossed the "I am Zod, and I wrote this book" part in there himself. No way, that's not possible. It obviously MUUUUST have been written by Zod. It says so. SO THERE!

    And let's say that on page 370 of this book, it said "Being African American is an abomination. It is a sin. Don't be African American, that's bad. If you do that, then you are sinning. And if you see someone who is African American, you should look down on them, because they are sinning by being African American."

    And let's say I came onto this track forum, and people were discussing the newest Denzel Washington movie, and I came on here and started taunting everyone and saying things like "Why are you guys okay watching a movie about an African American. Are YOU guys African American. Ooooooh, that's bad, you guys are sinners! Gross get away! Makes me nauseous! Eww!"

    And you, TrackDaddy, asked me "Hey, what the heck are you doing? Are you for real? Are you seriously giving me crap for being African American? That's racist. I have no control over the race that I am, and I'm proud of my race by the way, and just what the heck do you think you are doing? Didn't you parents raise you to have tolerance for others, and not look down on people for something they had no control over? This is messed up man..."

    and I said "Hey, I didn't make the rules man, Zod did. He wrote it in The Zible. Look on page 370. It says it right there, "being African American is an abomination. It is a sin." So, as a devout Zoinkian, I follow the word of The Zible, and since it tells me that you are comitting a sin by being African American, of course I'm going to look down on you and tell you that your existance makes me nausious. The Zible told me to! Can't you understand, it's my religion, it tells me I should feel this way about you, can't you respect that?"


    Now, I think we can all agree that would be pretty fucked up shit right there.

    (For the record, I am not a racist, and a lot of my friends are African American, in case any of you guys missunderstood understand the point I was trying to make just now).

    Anyway, THIS is essentially what you are doing, TrackDaddy. It's no different. Sure, to YOU it seems different, because you feel that there is no chance whatsoever that The Bible is not really the word of God or that God might not exist, or that The Bible could be wrong about anything. But, in my example with the Zoinkians, the Zoinkians feel the SAME EXACT WAY about THEIR religion as you do about yours. So how is it any different if they pulled that sort of racist shit on you, citing their religious text which they felt there was no chance whatsoever was not real, and used it as their explanation for why they were acting the way they did towards you. Do you get this? Do you see now why it bothers some people so much when you act the way you do about homosexuals.

    To many of us, the way you act or talk about homosexuals is no different than if I was acting the way the fictional Zoinkian character was acting in my example above. So, try to think about how you would feel about this theoretical Zoinkian character, and realize that THAT is how a lot of us feel about the way YOU act. That you are no better than this Zoinkian character would be.

    Do you understand now why many of us are so pissed off at the negative way you talk about homosexuals and homosexuality? That to many of us, the way you are acting is exactly the same thing, the same fucked up as how that Zoinkian guy's actions would be if he existed and posted on here the way I described? Do you get that?
    Listen up Atheist (have you ever prayed? I bet you have. If so, to who? :wink: :lol: )

    First....there are reasons beyond the Bible which Ive shared here before for taking exception to certain things.

    Like the unnatural opposition to man's instinct to procreate which I believe will ultimately threaten the familial infrastructure and disrupt the species.

    Second,,,being black isnt a sexual desire nor can it be associated with one logically.

    Sex is an ACT. Black is a STATE.

    One has moral inplications and the other one...doesnt.

    Write that down.

    Thirdly...you dont have to be offended because you believe I dont support certain lifestyles.

    I love everyone but I dont like everything people do.

    Take self proclaimed :roll: atheists for example....

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackDaddy
    replied
    [quote=mump boy]
    Originally posted by TrackDaddy
    (Self proclaimed) Atheist...

    Below is how I deduced certain things about the movie.

    Like its an extremely gay movie with penis overload.

    If you'd read these posts before you typed, you could've saved yourself some key strokes in your effort to only blame me for my perspective.

    From what I read I was lead to ask why a straight guy would want to see it. That's understandable since apparently some people walked out.

    You typed on and on about the "rest of the movie" which you saw in the trailers. :roll:

    But apparently gay humor featuring a not so suprising associated obsession with penises is part of the focus.

    It's my opinion that gay people are pushing their agenda as they have more and more influence over media, in particular Hollywood and motion pictures.

    Personally I'm not on board with the agenda nor will I ever be.

    Originally posted by "ross sez":3js9nvuf
    Saw it. It was pretty funny... but did I like it? NO. It was a terrible movie, and I'm not a homophobe in any way... but it was just too gay of a movie for me. It was quite disturbing and the shock value of 90% of the movie was wayyy too over the top to like it.
    Wayyy too much penis in the movie.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    If you like looking at giant penis's and firehoses shooting up guys ass's then this is your movie.

    My son went, saw people walk out after 30 seconds. I think i'll miss this one.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I'm so old fashion i still believe the old saying and request....PRIVATES!
    Borat shows his Penis and ambushes unsuspecting people and he's no.1 at the box office, kinda sad to this old fart.

    Hey, how can we film actual farts? Wouldnt that be great? I smell a hit, no Epic!
    Originally posted by mojo
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I only speak for myself of course but i think women's breasts are beautiful, veiny, wrinkled organs not so much.

    You speak for me too...which is very :shock: :?

    I like what penises can do but I don't really wanna look at them. :?
    Originally posted by EZSum
    I must have watched half the movie through my fingers cringing with embarassment but I laughed like a drain and it did a good job of pointing out how absurdly homophobic some people are.

    The talking penis scene isn't nearly as problematic for me as the bit where he's supposed to be performing sex acts on the Milli Vanilli guy's ghost. :shock:
    i never realised you were such a twat before but it has now been duly noted

    the film isn't overloaded with penis in fact i can only think of one scene, which is probably the funniest in the film

    the film is hilarious and stars a straight man so your assumption that only gay people would want to see it is nonsense

    everyone else seems to understand that you may want to go an see it because it's plain funny, it's you who seems obsessed with cock :?[/quote:3js9nvuf]

    Why are you mad at me, Rump Boy...uh...I mean Mump Boy?

    It was the other posters I quoted who said the movie was extremely gay and overloaded with penis.

    I havent seen the movie and only asked the question because my friends here said it was over the top.

    So...

    I merely asked why would a straight man want to see the type of movie that they described.

    Isnt that a fair question based on their descriptions?

    Man...how do I get blamed for everything?

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackDaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mikewats
    trackdaddy's religious beliefs make him a homophobe, pretty simple really.

    Borat was hilarious so i probably will see Bruno when it's shown on T.V, penises don't scare me. I don't feel the need to show my disgust for other people's penises just to show how straight I am. People that do i feel are just over compensating for a fear that deep down inside they feel they're Gay.
    A phobia is a fear.

    I feel disgust.

    I dont believe that anyone is "gay" per se.

    Not even you.

    You can't "be" it because its a desire, not a genetic trait.

    See...being gay isn't a gender or a race.

    Its just managing an inordinate lust...like necrophilia.

    So...

    Even though you like to watch dicks, its all in your mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3
    replied
    Bruno has been banned from theatres in the Ukraine.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by Flumpy
    Well this is quite the stupidest thread to appear on T&FN for a long time.

    As someone who has seen the film and found it hilarious if completely contrived I can tell you all that the penis scene lasts for about 20 seconds and is amongst the funniest in the film.

    Calling it a 'gay penis movie' as about as correct as calling E.T. a monster movie about bicycles.
    Or the movie The Graduate is about having sex with older woman, Cougar's gone wild.

    Because i started this stoopid thread and it's gone places i never invisioned i want to make my position, as Nixon would say, very clear.

    99% of all my posts are looking for humor, sometimes falling horribly. I have nothing against the male body, i think it's beautiful. My own penis has brought me great joy and has rarely let me down.

    I do think it's funny/sad that a straight guy is so horrified by a naked man that he runs from the theatre screaming ahhhh, im not gay, ahhhhhh!

    I dont like seeing sex scenes in movies when i feel they aren't neccesary, sometimes they are. It sounds like Bruno needed to show cock to make the bit work, that's cool. To each his own. Do not judge others lest you be judged. He who is without penis cast the........forget that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flumpy
    replied
    Well this is quite the stupidest thread to appear on T&FN for a long time.

    As someone who has seen the film and found it hilarious if completely contrived I can tell you all that the penis scene lasts for about 20 seconds and is amongst the funniest in the film.

    Calling it a 'gay penis movie' as about as correct as calling E.T. a monster movie about bicycles.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Atheist
    replied
    It's sad the effect taking the word of The Bible literally, letter for letter, can have on a person. TrackDaddy is doing a good job of demonstrating this right here in this thread.

    Can you imagine if I was part of some religion, let's call it Zoinkianity, that had it's own religious text, which was said to have been written by Zod (the God the people of the Zoinkian religion believed in let's say) and in the text it said that it was written by Zod, therefore, if the book says it was written by Zod, then it MUST be true! There's no way some random smart person who a desire to have control over a lot of people could have possibly written it himself, and merely PRETENDED it had been written by Zos, and tossed the "I am Zod, and I wrote this book" part in there himself. No way, that's not possible. It obviously MUUUUST have been written by Zod. It says so. SO THERE!

    And let's say that on page 370 of this book, it said "Being African American is an abomination. It is a sin. Don't be African American, that's bad. If you do that, then you are sinning. And if you see someone who is African American, you should look down on them, because they are sinning by being African American."

    And let's say I came onto this track forum, and people were discussing the newest Denzel Washington movie, and I came on here and started taunting everyone and saying things like "Why are you guys okay watching a movie about an African American. Are YOU guys African American. Ooooooh, that's bad, you guys are sinners! Gross get away! Makes me nauseous! Eww!"

    And you, TrackDaddy, asked me "Hey, what the heck are you doing? Are you for real? Are you seriously giving me crap for being African American? That's racist. I have no control over the race that I am, and I'm proud of my race by the way, and just what the heck do you think you are doing? Didn't you parents raise you to have tolerance for others, and not look down on people for something they had no control over? This is messed up man..."

    and I said "Hey, I didn't make the rules man, Zod did. He wrote it in The Zible. Look on page 370. It says it right there, "being African American is an abomination. It is a sin." So, as a devout Zoinkian, I follow the word of The Zible, and since it tells me that you are comitting a sin by being African American, of course I'm going to look down on you and tell you that your existance makes me nausious. The Zible told me to! Can't you understand, it's my religion, it tells me I should feel this way about you, can't you respect that?"


    Now, I think we can all agree that would be pretty fucked up shit right there.

    (For the record, I am not a racist, and a lot of my friends are African American, in case any of you guys missunderstood understand the point I was trying to make just now).

    Anyway, THIS is essentially what you are doing, TrackDaddy. It's no different. Sure, to YOU it seems different, because you feel that there is no chance whatsoever that The Bible is not really the word of God or that God might not exist, or that The Bible could be wrong about anything. But, in my example with the Zoinkians, the Zoinkians feel the SAME EXACT WAY about THEIR religion as you do about yours. So how is it any different if they pulled that sort of racist shit on you, citing their religious text which they felt there was no chance whatsoever was not real, and used it as their explanation for why they were acting the way they did towards you. Do you get this? Do you see now why it bothers some people so much when you act the way you do about homosexuals.

    To many of us, the way you act or talk about homosexuals is no different than if I was acting the way the fictional Zoinkian character was acting in my example above. So, try to think about how you would feel about this theoretical Zoinkian character, and realize that THAT is how a lot of us feel about the way YOU act. That you are no better than this Zoinkian character would be.

    Do you understand now why many of us are so pissed off at the negative way you talk about homosexuals and homosexuality? That to many of us, the way you are acting is exactly the same thing, the same fucked up as how that Zoinkian guy's actions would be if he existed and posted on here the way I described? Do you get that?

    Leave a comment:


  • mump boy
    replied
    Originally posted by TrackDaddy
    (Self proclaimed) Atheist...

    Below is how I deduced certain things about the movie.

    Like its an extremely gay movie with penis overload.

    If you'd read these posts before you typed, you could've saved yourself some key strokes in your effort to only blame me for my perspective.

    From what I read I was lead to ask why a straight guy would want to see it. That's understandable since apparently some people walked out.

    You typed on and on about the "rest of the movie" which you saw in the trailers. :roll:

    But apparently gay humor featuring a not so suprising associated obsession with penises is part of the focus.

    It's my opinion that gay people are pushing their agenda as they have more and more influence over media, in particular Hollywood and motion pictures.

    Personally I'm not on board with the agenda nor will I ever be.

    Originally posted by ross sez
    Saw it. It was pretty funny... but did I like it? NO. It was a terrible movie, and I'm not a homophobe in any way... but it was just too gay of a movie for me. It was quite disturbing and the shock value of 90% of the movie was wayyy too over the top to like it.
    Wayyy too much penis in the movie.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    If you like looking at giant penis's and firehoses shooting up guys ass's then this is your movie.

    My son went, saw people walk out after 30 seconds. I think i'll miss this one.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I'm so old fashion i still believe the old saying and request....PRIVATES!
    Borat shows his Penis and ambushes unsuspecting people and he's no.1 at the box office, kinda sad to this old fart.

    Hey, how can we film actual farts? Wouldnt that be great? I smell a hit, no Epic!
    Originally posted by mojo
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I only speak for myself of course but i think women's breasts are beautiful, veiny, wrinkled organs not so much.

    You speak for me too...which is very :shock: :?

    I like what penises can do but I don't really wanna look at them. :?
    Originally posted by EZSum
    I must have watched half the movie through my fingers cringing with embarassment but I laughed like a drain and it did a good job of pointing out how absurdly homophobic some people are.

    The talking penis scene isn't nearly as problematic for me as the bit where he's supposed to be performing sex acts on the Milli Vanilli guy's ghost. :shock:
    i never realised you were such a twat before but it has now been duly noted

    the film isn't overloaded with penis in fact i can only think of one scene, which is probably the funniest in the film

    the film is hilarious and stars a straight man so your assumption that only gay people would want to see it is nonsense

    everyone else seems to understand that you may want to go an see it because it's plain funny, it's you who seems obsessed with cock :?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mikewats
    replied
    trackdaddy's religious beliefs make him a homophobe, pretty simple really.

    Borat was hilarious so i probably will see Bruno when it's shown on T.V, penises don't scare me. I don't feel the need to show my disgust for other people's penises just to show how straight I am. People that do i feel are just over compensating for a fear that deep down inside they feel they're Gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackDaddy
    replied
    (Self proclaimed) Atheist...

    Below is how I deduced certain things about the movie.

    Like its an extremely gay movie with penis overload.

    If you'd read these posts before you typed, you could've saved yourself some key strokes in your effort to only blame me for my perspective.

    From what I read I was lead to ask why a straight guy would want to see it. That's understandable since apparently some people walked out.

    You typed on and on about the "rest of the movie" which you saw in the trailers. :roll:

    But apparently gay humor featuring a not so suprising associated obsession with penises is part of the focus.

    It's my opinion that gay people are pushing their agenda as they have more and more influence over media, in particular Hollywood and motion pictures.

    Personally I'm not on board with the agenda nor will I ever be.

    Originally posted by ross sez
    Saw it. It was pretty funny... but did I like it? NO. It was a terrible movie, and I'm not a homophobe in any way... but it was just too gay of a movie for me. It was quite disturbing and the shock value of 90% of the movie was wayyy too over the top to like it.
    Wayyy too much penis in the movie.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    If you like looking at giant penis's and firehoses shooting up guys ass's then this is your movie.

    My son went, saw people walk out after 30 seconds. I think i'll miss this one.
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I'm so old fashion i still believe the old saying and request....PRIVATES!
    Borat shows his Penis and ambushes unsuspecting people and he's no.1 at the box office, kinda sad to this old fart.

    Hey, how can we film actual farts? Wouldnt that be great? I smell a hit, no Epic!
    Originally posted by mojo
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE

    I only speak for myself of course but i think women's breasts are beautiful, veiny, wrinkled organs not so much.

    You speak for me too...which is very :shock: :?

    I like what penises can do but I don't really wanna look at them. :?
    Originally posted by EZSum
    I must have watched half the movie through my fingers cringing with embarassment but I laughed like a drain and it did a good job of pointing out how absurdly homophobic some people are.

    The talking penis scene isn't nearly as problematic for me as the bit where he's supposed to be performing sex acts on the Milli Vanilli guy's ghost. :shock:

    Leave a comment:


  • Marlow
    replied
    Wow, talk about much ado about nothing! To paraphrase Groucho, sometimes a penis is just a penis. Pretty much all the men on the planet have one. It's certainly not cause for concern. Like Squackee, I'm not on the lookout to go see a movie with some in it, but I am also not going to discount the comedic possibilities of a film that does show one. But it still has to be funny! Penises, of themselves, are not all that funny (unless you're Cohen, and then apparently they're hysterical, all the time!), but I'm sure they CAN be cause for humor, just like most everything else on the planet. In short, there's no reason to reject a film just cuz they show some. :roll:

    Leave a comment:


  • The Atheist
    replied
    Originally posted by TrackDaddy
    Originally posted by The Atheist
    Furthermore, TrackDaddy, I would like to add one more thing to this:

    You keep saying "I just don't understand why a straight person would like to look at penises."

    However, the problem with this statement is the following:

    You are implying that the straight men who were watching the movie Bruno enjoyed looking at penises

    This, obviously, does NOT have to be the case. Let me explain:

    Let's say that the movie is 2 hours long, and there is a 3 minute segment where they are showing a penis.

    And let's say the straight men in the audience DON'T like to look at penises. Is there anything they can possibly do now? I mean, gosh, there's a PENIS on the SCREEN!!! Whatever shall they do!?!???? Oh wait, I know, maybe, if the mere sight of a penis truly disgusts them and makes them feel awful, they can simply NOT LOOK AT IT DUUHHHHHHHH! Just look at your feet, or close your eyes, or turn away. How hard is that concept. Then, you can watch the other 99% of the movie, which maybe IS funny or enjoyable to watch, and problem solved. I bet you there were TOOOOONS of straight men that watched Bruno and decided to look away when the penis was shown on the screen, and were still able to enjoy the movie, despite turning away during the parts where a penis was being shown.

    So you see, this explains how it is possible even for someone who is truly disgusted by the sight of a penis to enjoy watching the movie Bruno even though they DO NOT ENJOY looking at penises. Get it?

    And this doesn't even mention the fact that, as mind-boggling as this might sound to you, there are actually many completely heterosexual men who do not feel disgusted, or upset, or nauseous, or whatever at the sight of a penis. Does the sight of a penis make them feel turned on, or aroused? No, they're straight. But does it make them feel nausious and disgusted? No. But how could this possibly be? I'll tell you how: Think about how you feel when you see a chair. Do you feel aroused, or turned on by the mere sight of a chair sitting in front of you? No, because you aren't attracted to chairs. You aren't a chairophile. It doesn't turn you on. It's just there. No big deal. That's how you feel about it. You feel like "So what... it's a fucking chair..." Right? But, do you feel DISGUSTED by the sight of the chair? Does the chair make you feel nausious and feel terrible and unhappy? No (unless it was a chair that was designed in the 70's :wink: :wink: :wink: :lol: ), it's just a chair, it doesn't turn you on at all, but it also doesn't disgust you or make you feel nausious, it's just a chair, who cares, whatever. Right? Okay, well THAT is how a lot of straight men are about seeing a penis. They aren't turned on by it at all, but at the same time, it doesn't make them feel nausious or disgusted or unhappy, it's just a dick, and it just plain doesn't do anything for them good OR bad, it's just like a chair or a garage or a tree or whatever the hell, it's just one of the many things that exists on earth that they neither find to be disgusting nor to be sexually arousing to them, but rather, NEITHER.

    When I was on my high school swim team, there were naked guys standing around in the locker room when we changed for practice. Did it turn me on? No... I'm not gay. Did it make me puke? No... the sight of a human penis doesn't make me feel nausious or disgusted or ANYTHING for that matter. It doesn't evoke ANY emotions for me... it's just a dick, who cares...

    When I was in Italy, and I went to see the statue of David, and there was his penis right in front of me, completely bared for all the world to see, did I feel sexually aroused by it? No... I'm not gay. Did I feel disgusted at the sight of it, and struggle not to puke? No, I didn't fee any emotion from it. In fact, my mind was focused on how skillfully crafted the sculpture was. That there were no flaws in the sculpting to be seen anywhere on it, even though it stood 16 feet tall. It was a magnificently crafted piece of art, and I enjoyed being able to see such a great feat of sculpture craftsmanship with my own eyes. So that means I like to look at dicks right? No... you just don't get it do you?


    Sigh...
    You're pretty passionate about defending going to a movie about a gay dude playing with penises.

    TrackDaddy, you keep saying that the movie is "about a gay dude playing with penises" but I strongly doubt that's what the movie is "about." Sure, maybe there is one scene where someone plays with a penis, but, I strongly doubt this makes up the whole entire movie, rather, much more likely it is just one small portion of the movie, with the vast majority of the film not having anything to do with that, or showing that. It's sort of like, if you said the movie Forrest Gump was "about a dude showing his bare ass to the audience." Was there a scene in the movie Forrest bared his buttocks? Yes. Was that what the movie was about? No, and if you told anyone who watched the movie Forrest Gump that that is what the movie was about, they would laugh in your face and call you a moron.

    See apparently it isn't about seeing an occasional glimpse ...but instead its overload. Admittedly a glimpse is overload for me...lol

    I haven't seen the movie, so I can't comment on how long the penis is showed for, but I STRONGLY DOUBT it is for more than a few minutes at the most. If it was the whole movie, then what were all those scenes they kept showing in the previews for the movie? They showed quite a few different scenes from the movie in the movie trailers that I saw and none of them had anything to do with penises being shown, so at the very least, I can be pretty damned sure that the whole movie isn't entirely just "about a guy playing with a penis" as you keep implying.

    Read the early post in the thread and notice that the person who started the thread doesn't recommend the movie for the same reason you'd enjoy it.

    I'm not sure what "for the same reason you'd enjoy it" means. I have no idea if I would enjoy the movie. I enjoyed his previous movie, Borat, because it had many hilarious scenes scattered throughout the movie. I haven't seen this movie, so I have no idea if it has as many hilarious scenes as Borat did. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. If you're implying that the reason I would enjoy the movie Bruno is that it shows a penis, you are quite mistaken. I don't enjoy watching penises. If there's a penis in the movie, it isn't going to make me barf or feel sick or anything, it's not a big deal to me, I would just ignore it and enjoy the REST of the movie where there aren't penises being shown, where funny stuff is happening that I enjoy laughing at.

    You said that if a guy didn't know there were penises in the movie before they went...well...now that you know...

    I never said anything about "if a guy didn't know there were penises in the movie before they went" I think someone else must have said that and you confused it as me saying that, cuz I definitely didn't say that anywhere in this thread. But anyway, as for the question of whether I'd still be willing to watch it, even though I knew now that there is a penis shown in the movie, my answer is, as long as the penis scene only makes up a small portion of the movie, and isn't like an hour of that or anything ridiculous, then sure if I thought the movie was going to have a bunch of funny scenes, I'd be willing to watch it. I would enjoy laughing during the funny scenes where (where there aren't any penises being shown) and then in the small portion of the movie that has a penis being shown, whatever I wouldn't enjoy that part, but the vast majority of all the movies I've ever seen in my whole life have had a few minutes at some point in the movie that I didn't enjoy. It's no biggie, as long as the rest of the movie was enjoyable it would be worth watching for me, sure.

    Have you bought a ticket?

    No I haven't seen The Hurt Locker, Public Enemies, or The Hangover yet, and all 3 of those movies are movies I badly want to see. I want to see those movies before they are no longer in theaters, and if after I've seen all of those Bruno is still in theaters, then I'll watch it, but most likely I won't see Bruno till it's on HBO or something.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQUACKEE
    replied
    Originally posted by TrackDaddy
    Originally posted by SQUACKEE
    A brillant post Atheist! I think you said it all. Bravo!
    Brilliant, huh? :roll:

    Wearing pom poms and a skirt in this thread could be miscontrued.

    Or not. :wink:
    I'm wearing them right now! I see your thinking about them and visualizing also.

    Just kidding, i am on a mission to rid the world of penis......except for mine! Bru hahahahahahah.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X