Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FINA officially declare themselves retarded

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marlow
    replied
    Clearly, these are not the Olympic swimsuits of 2004 or even 2008. They’re faster, more high-tech and made of materials that trap air and allow for better buoyancy.
    First I'd seen that admission.

    Leave a comment:


  • gh
    replied
    Phelps is so pissed off he's sitting things out:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/p ... le1234429/

    Leave a comment:


  • Marlow
    replied
    Originally posted by gh
    At up to 500 bucks a suit (and they don't last long), no, everybody can't get the technology. It creates an unacceptable financial wedge.
    And that isn't happening at the high school level ALL the time? My PVers win sometimes just because we have more poles than other schools. Coincidentally, good poles are $500 a pop. Should the nationally federation limit the poles a school can have?

    But . . . I am now reading that the suits actually DO alter a swimmer's 'ability' to go fast (other than the reduced friction) - that's a different matter!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pego
    replied
    Originally posted by bhall
    Structural integrity was my term/interpretation. 4:11 news piece/interview- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =106989036
    Thank you. After listening to Mr. Wood, I still don't understand, how those suits help lesser athletes over the better ones, but he insisted, that is the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • lonewolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Marlow
    [The key is that anyone can get the technology. In swimming, everyone can have the suit. Level playing field.
    In theory yes but not every HS swimmer can afford to buy these slick suits. Perhaps it is not an issue at the world level but my granddaughter, a nationally ranked HS swimmer, in her own reverse leveling of the playing field, declined wearing the suit because not all swimmers had them. Didn't seem to matter, she still defeated swimmers who wore the suits.

    Leave a comment:


  • dakota
    replied
    Originally posted by lapsus
    How long before the world records from last year will be broken? Will there be a bunch of unbreakable records from 2008 hanging over the sport for the foreseeable future?
    Most of them got broken this afternoon. Or at least that's what it seemed like.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhall
    replied
    The perception is that the suits aid lesser athletes more. Whether that is reality or not I don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • gh
    replied
    Originally posted by Marlow
    Originally posted by gh
    I've never thought an individual sport should be about who has the better engineer on his side.
    The Pole Vault, the Javelin and the Discus, all employ high-tech engineers. Not all implements are created equal. The key is that anyone can get the technology. In swimming, everyone can have the suit. Level playing field.
    At up to 500 bucks a suit (and they don't last long), no, everybody can't get the technology. It creates an unacceptable financial wedge.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhall
    replied
    Structural integrity was my term/interpretation. 4:11 news piece/interview- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =106989036

    Leave a comment:


  • lapsus
    replied
    Javelin results from 1991 were nullified, including Räty's 96.96. FINA should have done the same for the world records set with at least the latest round of bodysuits.

    How long before the world records from last year will be broken? Will there be a bunch of unbreakable records from 2008 hanging over the sport for the foreseeable future?

    Oh well. I hope that FINA at least won't be adopting beach volleyball-like coverage rules for the swimsuits :wink:

    Leave a comment:


  • Marlow
    replied
    Originally posted by gh
    I've never thought an individual sport should be about who has the better engineer on his side.
    The Pole Vault, the Javelin and the Discus, all employ high-tech engineers. Not all implements are created equal. The key is that anyone can get the technology. In swimming, everyone can have the suit. Level playing field.

    Leave a comment:


  • dakota
    replied
    Is anybody watching these world championships this afternoon? World records left right and centre. In heats. In finals. On the first legs of relays. Completely ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pego
    replied
    Originally posted by bhall
    Interview I heard indicated that the suits also aided the structural integrity (core) of the athlete. So weaker athletes were aided more by the suits.
    Did they explain the "structural integrity"? What exactly does it do to the body that reduces the handicap? I can understand shaping of the body, but this term is new to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhall
    replied
    Interview I heard indicated that the suits also aided the structural integrity (core) of the athlete. So weaker athletes were aided more by the suits.

    Leave a comment:


  • gh
    replied
    Buoyancy isn't the issue; it's the artificial reduction of drag that's at issue. This stuff is much slipperier than skin. And wearing "full body" suits can also change one's body configuration (for the better).

    I've never thought an individual sport should be about who has the better engineer on his side.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎