Originally posted by jazzcyclist
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2009 College Football Predictions
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
-
The entire season we have heard "Big Ten is Overrated" chants. Bookies must have agreed, as only Penn St. (possibly Minnesota) were razor thin favorites. Well, four of them won, two (Northwestern and Minnesota) should have."A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
Originally posted by 26mi235Again, "that could have easily gone either way" is a statement about how the breaks come out. As it turned out, Miami got about 80% of the breaks in the game, and if they had gotten 95% they would have won. Getting 95% of the breaks is NOT "could have EASILY gone the other way".
As to your larger point, I agree with you that Wisconsin, Iowa and Ohio State thoroughly dominated their bowl opponents and the Big Ten acquitted itself well during the bowl season. I just disagree with anyone who says that the outcome of the Miami-Wisconsin game was never in doubt.
Comment
-
FYI, the teams with the 25 toughest schedules in 2009 were, in order:- Mississippi State 0.868
Alabama 0.842
Georgia 0.807
Virginia Tech 0.791
Florida State 0.791
Florida 0.79
Oregon 0.778
South Carolina 0.769
Arizona 0.76
Louisiana State 0.757
Georgia Tech 0.756
Baylor 0.756
Miami (Florida) 0.755
Oklahoma 0.751
Arkansas 0.749
Washington 0.748
Texas 0.747
Clemson 0.736
Auburn 0.736
Washington State 0.732
Southern California 0.711
Vanderbilt 0.711
Virginia 0.707
UCLA 0.705
Connecticut 0.703
And the teams with the 25 weakest schedules in 2009 were:- Temple 0.242
Army 0.242
Western Michigan 0.263
Kent 0.276
Middle Tennessee State 0.306
Northern Illinois 0.317
Ball State 0.336
Texas-El Paso 0.345
North Texas 0.359
Louisiana-Lafayette 0.364
Toledo 0.375
Arkansas State 0.378
Ohio 0.379
Tulsa 0.384
Louisiana-Monroe 0.386
Southern Mississippi 0.402
Florida Atlantic 0.402
Buffalo 0.405
Western Kentucky 0.409
Central Michigan 0.41
Southern Methodist 0.414
Eastern Michigan 0.414
Akron 0.432
Hawaii 0.433
New Mexico State 0.434
http://www.jhowell.net/cf/cf2009.htm
Also, here are the final conference power rankings in order, which I'm sure will please guru:- SEC 0.711
Big East 0.656
Big 12 0.641
Pac 10 0.624
ACC 0.616
Big Ten 0.613
MWC 0.532
Independent 0.531
WAC 0.502
CUSA 0.465
MAC 0.424
Sun Belt 0.409
Comment
- Mississippi State 0.868
-
Originally posted by jazzcyclistOriginally posted by PegoI find it amusing that Big Ten went 2-0 over favored ACC opponents, yet the conference has a lower "power ranking"."A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
by Thomas Henry Huxley
Comment
-
Whenever I think about this year's championship game, I will always wonder what might have been had McCoy not gotten hurt. McCoy was as important to this year's Longhorn offense as Vince Young was four year ago, and no thinking person believes that the 2005 Texas team would have beaten USC without Young. Texas was put in an impossible situation when they were forced to go with a freshman quarterback in that situation and I'm surprised that they were able to keep it as close they did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazzcyclistTexas was put in an impossible situation when they were forced to go with a freshman quarterback in that situation and I'm surprised that they were able to keep it as close they did.
If you take away that terrible shovel pass call that went for an INT TD at the end of the 1st half, Texas is leading by 4 with 3 minutes to go instead of down 3. With Texas not likely to be passing the ball on their own 7 with a lead(or consequently fumbling), it would have been interesting to see if Bama could have come back.
All moot now of course.
Comment
-
Gary Patterson is even more optimistic about next year's TCU team than he was about this year's, and said that he didn't expect this year's team to go 12-0 and make it to the BCS.
Patterson said on the eve of the game that he was a little surprised TCU had gone 12-0 and reached a BCS bowl game for the first time this season.
"I thought next year would be the best football team we had because lost seven starters off last year's defense that was No. 1 statistically in the nation," he said. "They kind of took it upon themselves as a whole group to kind of grow up."
Comment
Comment