The mods have made it very clear that objectifying women by commenting on their 'looks' is taboo. I can understand that. I certainly do want people to judge my daughter on her other attributes besides her stunning personal attractiveness ( :wink: 8-) ). But it was the PTB here that linked this article on the home page
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/g ... 423?page=2
Wherein a very complicit Vicki Parnov displays her rather comely figure. So now we understand that woman can objectify themselves. But . . . suppose WE were to comment on certain portions of her anatomy. I'm thinking THAT would be frowned upon here. So now I'm confused. A woman can try and capital on her physical beauty, but when men take notice, that's a bad thing.
I was not being facetious nor disingenuous when I said I was confused. I really am. Comments on this?
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/g ... 423?page=2
Wherein a very complicit Vicki Parnov displays her rather comely figure. So now we understand that woman can objectify themselves. But . . . suppose WE were to comment on certain portions of her anatomy. I'm thinking THAT would be frowned upon here. So now I'm confused. A woman can try and capital on her physical beauty, but when men take notice, that's a bad thing.
I was not being facetious nor disingenuous when I said I was confused. I really am. Comments on this?
Comment