Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Man of Steel

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Man of Steel

    You knew that I, ├╝ber-geek fanboy that I am ( ops: ), would have to start a thread about this movie. Out 3 days, it's already made over $200M. Of COURSE I liked it, but there was waaaay too much violence and destruction. Are character development and interwoven plot lines too much to ask? HC was perfect in the role (Mrs. M swooned several times, I think), but everyone else was a place-holder. Oh well, with this $ucce$$, there'll be plenty more to do other interesting things with.

  • #2
    Re: Man of Steel

    The fights/destruction and the interminable length of them are for no other reason than to justify 3D. And 3D adds more money to the till. Violence was on par or even less than most movies; it's not like someone's head was crushed in someone's hands. They got some A-list talent to sit in: Costner, Fishburne, Lane (not Lois, Diane)...not bad.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Man of Steel

      Originally posted by batonless relay
      The fights/destruction and the interminable length of them are for no other reason than to justify 3D. And 3D adds more money to the till. Violence was on par or even less than most movies; it's not like someone's head was crushed in someone's hands. They got some A-list talent to sit in: Costner, Fishburne, Lane (not Lois, Diane)...not bad.
      I'm over 3D in almost all movies. We went to the 2D IMAX show. It was worth the extra screen space. I like Kevin Costner in anything. Just very 'believable'.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Man of Steel

        Originally posted by Marlow
        Originally posted by batonless relay
        The fights/destruction and the interminable length of them are for no other reason than to justify 3D. And 3D adds more money to the till. Violence was on par or even less than most movies; it's not like someone's head was crushed in someone's hands. They got some A-list talent to sit in: Costner, Fishburne, Lane (not Lois, Diane)...not bad.
        I'm over 3D in almost all movies. We went to the 2D IMAX show. It was worth the extra screen space. I like Kevin Costner in anything. Just very 'believable'.
        I never watch 3D anymore. I've watched two 3D movies total and the experience just isn't for me, nor is it worth the additional money, imo.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Man of Steel

          I don't do 3D. Having vision in only one eye, I don't know what y'all are talking about.
          Dithering about seeing Man of Steel . I remember when the original Superman came out, circa 1937, (my town cousins had comic books) and suspect the story line is about the same.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Man of Steel

            I took my two boys (7 & 11) to see it. Too loud for them. And far too much fighting for the sake of it for me. It was what I expected and fairly good for the genre, i guess. But as Marlow mentioned, the script writers really could do a lot more with the stories in these movies.

            We also opted for the 2D. I don't think we missed much.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Man of Steel

              Originally posted by lonewolf
              I remember when the original Superman came out, circa 1937 and suspect the story line is about the same.
              Well, they DID mess with the story, but as you can imagine, Superman is Superman. In this movie he becomes Sman at 33 (ring any scriptural bells? - at one point he also floats with his arms straight out) and Lois Lane figures out the CK alias near the beginning. He has LOTS of angst which MY Sman didn't have, but the one of the 80s and beyond did.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Man of Steel

                Lots of press about the Christian symbolisms... even commentary about how evangelicals are embracing the movie as an affirmation of faith. Is it that heavy-handed?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Man of Steel

                  Originally posted by jhc68
                  Lots of press about the Christian symbolisms... even commentary about how evangelicals are embracing the movie as an affirmation of faith. Is it that heavy-handed?
                  Not when it's so obvious. Both Pa Kent and Jor-El speak to him as though he's mankind's messiah. There's even a 'sermon kit' put out by the movie's promotion dept for Xtian preachers.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Man of Steel

                    Saw it with my girls on Father's Day. I liked it a lot. It was gritty, and full of back-story and origins, which I love. I liked this Zod much better than the 125 pound original Zod, and Amy Adams at least looks like someone who a Super Hero could fall in love with. Also, this Cavill dude is some scenes looks like he could be Christopher Reeve's son.

                    The Jesus connection was everywhere. I noticed the age 33 thing as well and the "Arms held out, in my Jesus Christ pose" thing often. The scene in the church with the stained-glass Jesus in the garden "take this cup from me/Thy will be done" right next to Superman's head while he's having pretty much the same discussion with the preacher/priest was incredibly obvious. Also, a "miraculous" birth of sorts fits in with that theme, as well as an "Only Son" being sent to Earth to save/guide it.
                    You there, on the motorbike! Sell me one of your melons!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Man of Steel

                      Originally posted by jhc68
                      Lots of press about the Christian symbolisms... even commentary about how evangelicals are embracing the movie as an affirmation of faith. Is it that heavy-handed?
                      I didn't notice it.

                      Originally posted by Marlow
                      Both Pa Kent and Jor-El speak to him as though he's mankind's messiah.
                      I did notice that Jor-El said "He'll be like a god to them" But that does not seem so out of place given what he can do.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Man of Steel

                        Haven't seen it yet, but glad a thread was started. I am always curious as to what direction each respective screenwriter and director takes with this character. Figures there would be more crashes and explosions, etc. thanks to better-developed CGI and the fact Nolan was brought on board after his successful "Dark Knight" trilogy; the darkening of the red and blue costume in the promos during the preceding months hinted as such.


                        Superman as a character is always a challenge. Outside of the super powers--especially flying--he is actually pretty bland, if not downright boring, as a personality.

                        With some modern deviational attempts aside, the character is basically a big Boy Scout. Always has been; that's why the old formulas in the comics centered around peripheral issues such as variety of specialized villains, Lois trying to discover his identity, the effects of Red Kryptonite, etc.--all external conflicts.

                        One of the big reasons for the popularity of the television series "Smallville" was that Clark was young and capable of making mistakes--which is always more interesting and relatable than an adult who is pretty much perfect, which is what the classic parameters of the Superman mythos force the character to be.


                        In fact, the only tried-and-true enduring fictional character I can remember being more superficial (pun intended), was the pulp hero Doc Savage. This is actually ironic, as advertisements for Doc Savage in other pulp books described him as "an intellectual genius...a physical superman..."

                        The Doc Savage pulp stories (the majority written by Lester Dent under the pseudonym Kenneth Robeson) were printed in the early '30's; Siegel & Shuster introduced "Superman" in 1939.

                        But neither Dent nor S&S invented the term/name. Both almost certainly got the term "superman" from our old buddy Nietzche (1844-1900; "That which does not kill me makes me stronger"), who--before his brain turned to tapioca from syphilis--coined the phrase "Uber Mensch" to describe his concept of the ultimate male.

                        [In the very first episode of "Smallville" there is a nicely-done tip of the hat to Friedrich N. as between classes at the high school Lana notices Clark has a copy of a Nietzche book and jokingly asks him "So...are you a man or a superman...?"]

                        And for the record, I have enjoyed both characters throughout the years. This is by no means meant to be an anti-Superman rant.
                        .

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Man of Steel

                          So since steel is stronger than iron does that mean that Superman would whup Downey? Enquiring minds...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Man of Steel

                            Originally posted by jeremyp
                            So since steel is stronger than iron does that mean that Superman would whup Downey? Enquiring minds...
                            Superman's heat vision would turn him into a slag-heap in a nano-second, which brings us to the character's 'problem', aside from his kryptonitephobia, he can beat anyone at anything, so what's the point? I loved how in the movie he had to strain mightily to keep an oil-platform from toppling, but he can smash things 100 times bigger/heavier with the flip of a wrist. The best part was when he had to go up against an overwhelming Kryptonian energy force and it took everything he had to do it. I actually got verklempt, because I am such a sap!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Man of Steel

                              Originally posted by Marlow
                              aside from his kryptonitephobia, he can beat anyone at anything, so what's the point?
                              Nah. The Hulk would give him a run for his money!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X