Originally posted by gh
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Clueless writing about our sport
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
X
-
Re: NYC Marathon T.V. coverage. Clueless reporting.
I just finished watching the local ABC-TV coverage, which I'd DVR'd and was 5 hours long. The guy that they had doing the reporting on the data that they gathered on several participants wasn't very informed. He reported on two people, saying that they were running 9:23 and 9:24 per mile and were on pace to both run 3:48 and change. Earlier in the broadcast he said that Meb was the greatest American marathon runner ever. O.K. that's his opinion, but I suppose he never heard of Shorter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KDFINE View PostRe: NYC Marathon T.V. coverage. Clueless reporting.
I just finished watching the local ABC-TV coverage, which I'd DVR'd and was 5 hours long. The guy that they had doing the reporting on the data that they gathered on several participants wasn't very informed. He reported on two people, saying that they were running 9:23 and 9:24 per mile and were on pace to both run 3:48 and change. Earlier in the broadcast he said that Meb was the greatest American marathon runner ever. O.K. that's his opinion, but I suppose he never heard of Shorter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam1729 View PostOn ESPN, even John Brenkus, who is their science guy, said the men were running at 4:47 pace, and said that was about a 2-12 marathon. 4:47 works out more like a 2-05:30 pace. They were on about 2-12 pace, certainly, but that is more like 5:02 pace
Comment
-
Originally posted by KDFINE View PostWe're talking about the same guy.
Comment
-
No need to say your sorry - you were watching ESPN and I was watching the local and national network. Brenkus was also giving misleading stuff about how ex-footballer Tiki Barber was doing. He wanted to break 4:00, and ran an average of 10:03 for the first half. He was in the midst of blowing up at 14+ / mile for the next split, and Brenkus suggested that he could still pick it up. He might be able to report on the physiological aspects of what was being monitored, but he apparently didn't know enough about the marathon to be able to make cogent statements about what was happening running wise.
Comment
-
Current SI article extolling the athletic skills of Julio Jones describing a TJ competition where, having fouled his first two jumps, he faced elimination writes,
"Jones lines up for his last attempt. But instead of walking back 40 feet from the jumping board, as everyone in the history of track has done, he stood 10 feet back. Jones took two walking steps, careful to stay behind the line, and leaped. He landed at exactly 43 feet."
Comment
-
Originally posted by lonewolf View Postinstead of walking back 40 feet from the jumping board, as everyone in the history of track has done, he stood 10 feet back. Jones took two walking steps, careful to stay behind the line, and leaped. He landed at exactly 43 feet."
Comment
-
I was amused by this photo caption (in an article now in the front page headline section):
>>New Orleans track star Audrey "Mickey" Patterson (second from left, wearing number 707) sprints to the finish line in the 200-meter dash at the 1948 Olympic Games in London. . . . her bronze would make her the first African-American women in history to win an Olympic gold medal. <<
She must have had a good alchemist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tandfman View PostI was amused by this photo caption (in an article now in the front page headline section):
>>New Orleans track star Audrey "Mickey" Patterson (second from left, wearing number 707) sprints to the finish line in the 200-meter dash at the 1948 Olympic Games in London. . . . her bronze would make her the first African-American women in history to win an Olympic gold medal. <<
She must have had a good alchemist.
Comment
Comment