If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It could have been worse....considering these writers interest in track only bubbles to the surface when a scandal occurs they could have identified Semenya as a shot putter. At least it's a running event.
Colorado Springs Style Magazine--a glossy thing with photos of older men and young trophy wives at black tie galas--had a recent article about the opening-next year US Olympic Museum, with these jewels:
"Every two and four years, we get a thrilling—if fleeting—chance to see the world’s best Olympic and Paralympic athletes in action. Stories of the 1980 USA hockey team, 400-yard dash record-setter Michael Johnson...."
Ryan Crouser and Joe Kovacs can heave a 16-pound ball farther than just about anyone else. Meanwhile, their lives have become track and field’s version of a buddy flick.
"Crouser and Kovacs’s domination of shot-put is one of the lesser known stories in track and field, a sport that does not have to worry about overexposure.
Being the best in the United States these days generally means being the best in the world, whether their fellow Americans notice or not. "
I guess Tom Walsh is chopped liver.
Another one in the clueless headline writer category. There's a story about 2018 NCAA Heptathlon champion Georgia Ellenwood now linked in the front page headline section. The headline refers to her as George Ellenwood.
This is a new one. It's a story in the U. of Florida school newspaper about the men's 4x100 rivalry between the Gators and LSU. The lede sentence reads: Fourteen milliseconds was the difference. He repeatedly thereafter refers to differences of milliseconds between two times. The problem is that milliseconds are thousandths of a second. The actual difference between the times referrred to in the lede sentence is .14, or fourteen hundredths of a second, not thousandths.
Comment