Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John Wayne

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    Ford never had Wayne's gravitas, but, like Wayne, he always played a stylized version of himself, just as Robert Downey does.
    The modern hero is seen differently. Guys like Wayne wouldn't work today, because we're more cynical. A close Wayne type on TV these days is the captain on "Last Ship." Humorless, stoic, in on every piece of action. Very retrograde.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by jeremyp View Post
      Guys like Wayne wouldn't work today, because we're more cynical.
      True Grit is arch-cynical. Hollywood had already arrived at that destination when Wayne was still thriving. Other 'modern' films of his:
      The Shootist
      Rooster Cogburn (TG2)
      Brannigan
      McQ
      Cahill
      The Cowboys

      Comment


      • #18
        bambam - I'll wait until this evening then give it my 'cheating' guess

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Atticus View Post
          True Grit is arch-cynical. Hollywood had already arrived at that destination when Wayne was still thriving. Other 'modern' films of his:
          The Shootist
          Rooster Cogburn (TG2)
          Brannigan
          McQ
          Cahill
          The Cowboys
          Arch Cynical? I can't think of any role played by Wayne that was cynical.

          Comment


          • #20
            Say wha? The premise is that he is a grumpy old man who wants nothing to do with Mattie and helps her for the money.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Per Andersen View Post
              Victor McLaglen? He was a boxer. I saw the Quiet Man. McLaglen and Wayne spent most of the movie fighting each other.

              I would never compare the likes of Harrison Ford to John Wayne. Wayne was effective and very good at what he did. Favorites: The Searchers and Liberty Valance.
              No - one of the producers of The Quiet Man was Lord Killanin, the IOC President from 1972-80

              Comment


              • #22
                bambam - my google cheat process yielded the same thing. I can't, in good conscience, take any credit, knowing what I didn't know. So I throw myself at the feet of the TFN message board trivia court.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Atticus View Post
                  Say wha? The premise is that he is a grumpy old man who wants nothing to do with Mattie and helps her for the money.
                  Oh! Faux Hollywood cynical.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by jeremyp View Post
                    Oh! Faux Hollywood cynical.
                    ??!! EVERYthing in Hollywood is faux. That's their reality!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I wouldn't say for a minute that Wayne was a bad actor!
                      I believed every word he said!
                      Which can't be said of some lines delivered by Laurence Olivier!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        John Wayne was a mans man... he projected power and courage and well, true grit ! .. I cant find a comparison with him today.... the guy that most filled the void left by Wayne was Clint Eastwood. It is safe to say that Eastwoods characters were far more cynical and self serving than Wayne. Probably says more about the culture than either man.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by user4 View Post
                          John Wayne was a mans man
                          If you mean he embodied Hollywood's cliche of a man, yes he did.
                          If you mean he stood for what a man should be, definitely not. The Hollywood cliche he embodied was chauvinistic, sexist, violent (perhaps psychopathologically so), and unable to express a wide range of honest emotions.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Atticus View Post
                            If you mean he embodied Hollywood's cliche of a man, yes he did.
                            If you mean he stood for what a man should be, definitely not. The Hollywood cliche he embodied was chauvinistic, sexist, violent (perhaps psychopathologically so), and unable to express a wide range of honest emotions.
                            I think you meant to say Hollywood's former cliché of a man, that is about right, Hollywoods' present lexicon of clichés has no understanding of what a man is. They are self-creating unisex beings living in a fantasy future where the y chromosome is a relic of the past.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by user4 View Post
                              Hollywoods' present lexicon of clichés has no understanding of what a man is. They are self-creating unisex beings living in a fantasy future where the y chromosome is a relic of the past.
                              No argument from me! ;-)
                              Women = strong empowered female with perfect face, hair and SMOKIN body.
                              Man = sensitive subservient arm-candy to the female, who just also happens to have washboard abs and Oliveresque delts.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Atticus View Post
                                No argument from me!
                                Women = strong empowered female with perfect face, hair and SMOKIN body.
                                Man = sensitive subservient arm-candy to the female, who just also happens to have washboard abs and Oliveresque delts.
                                You guys have got to be kidding me. How many examples of ultimate testosterone loaded machismo from recent movies do you want? Utter nonsense like Riddick for example? If anything, Hollywood is deviating more and more from reality if that's even possible.
                                "A beautiful theory killed by an ugly fact."
                                by Thomas Henry Huxley

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎