Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John Wayne

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • user4
    replied
    Originally posted by Pego View Post
    I think, the last one of those that I saw was Terms of endearment. Otherwise, it is Pulp fiction, Usual suspects...;-).
    Those both of those movies were good in their own right, I cant imagine John Wayne staring in either of them. Mostly because they depicted the worst of male behavior.
    Last edited by user4; 08-23-2014, 06:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pego
    replied
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    Sorry - I wasn't talking about the cartoonish comic-book fantasy s**t, I was referring to H'wood's take on the modern man in relationship movies.
    I think, the last one of those that I saw was Terms of endearment. Otherwise, it is Pulp fiction, Usual suspects...;-).

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Originally posted by Pego View Post
    You guys have got to be kidding me. How many examples of ultimate testosterone loaded machismo from recent movies do you want? Utter nonsense like Riddick for example? If anything, Hollywood is deviating more and more from reality if that's even possible.
    Sorry - I wasn't talking about the cartoonish comic-book fantasy s**t, I was referring to H'wood's take on the modern man in relationship movies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pego
    replied
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    No argument from me!
    Women = strong empowered female with perfect face, hair and SMOKIN body.
    Man = sensitive subservient arm-candy to the female, who just also happens to have washboard abs and Oliveresque delts.
    You guys have got to be kidding me. How many examples of ultimate testosterone loaded machismo from recent movies do you want? Utter nonsense like Riddick for example? If anything, Hollywood is deviating more and more from reality if that's even possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Originally posted by user4 View Post
    Hollywoods' present lexicon of clichés has no understanding of what a man is. They are self-creating unisex beings living in a fantasy future where the y chromosome is a relic of the past.
    No argument from me! ;-)
    Women = strong empowered female with perfect face, hair and SMOKIN body.
    Man = sensitive subservient arm-candy to the female, who just also happens to have washboard abs and Oliveresque delts.

    Leave a comment:


  • user4
    replied
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    If you mean he embodied Hollywood's cliche of a man, yes he did.
    If you mean he stood for what a man should be, definitely not. The Hollywood cliche he embodied was chauvinistic, sexist, violent (perhaps psychopathologically so), and unable to express a wide range of honest emotions.
    I think you meant to say Hollywood's former cliché of a man, that is about right, Hollywoods' present lexicon of clichés has no understanding of what a man is. They are self-creating unisex beings living in a fantasy future where the y chromosome is a relic of the past.

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Originally posted by user4 View Post
    John Wayne was a mans man
    If you mean he embodied Hollywood's cliche of a man, yes he did.
    If you mean he stood for what a man should be, definitely not. The Hollywood cliche he embodied was chauvinistic, sexist, violent (perhaps psychopathologically so), and unable to express a wide range of honest emotions.

    Leave a comment:


  • user4
    replied
    John Wayne was a mans man... he projected power and courage and well, true grit ! .. I cant find a comparison with him today.... the guy that most filled the void left by Wayne was Clint Eastwood. It is safe to say that Eastwoods characters were far more cynical and self serving than Wayne. Probably says more about the culture than either man.

    Leave a comment:


  • FrankS
    replied
    I wouldn't say for a minute that Wayne was a bad actor!
    I believed every word he said!
    Which can't be said of some lines delivered by Laurence Olivier!

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Originally posted by jeremyp View Post
    Oh! Faux Hollywood cynical.
    ??!! EVERYthing in Hollywood is faux. That's their reality!

    Leave a comment:


  • jeremyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    Say wha? The premise is that he is a grumpy old man who wants nothing to do with Mattie and helps her for the money.
    Oh! Faux Hollywood cynical.

    Leave a comment:


  • no one
    replied
    bambam - my google cheat process yielded the same thing. I can't, in good conscience, take any credit, knowing what I didn't know. So I throw myself at the feet of the TFN message board trivia court.

    Leave a comment:


  • bambam1729
    replied
    Originally posted by Per Andersen View Post
    Victor McLaglen? He was a boxer. I saw the Quiet Man. McLaglen and Wayne spent most of the movie fighting each other.

    I would never compare the likes of Harrison Ford to John Wayne. Wayne was effective and very good at what he did. Favorites: The Searchers and Liberty Valance.
    No - one of the producers of The Quiet Man was Lord Killanin, the IOC President from 1972-80

    Leave a comment:


  • Atticus
    replied
    Say wha? The premise is that he is a grumpy old man who wants nothing to do with Mattie and helps her for the money.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeremyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Atticus View Post
    True Grit is arch-cynical. Hollywood had already arrived at that destination when Wayne was still thriving. Other 'modern' films of his:
    The Shootist
    Rooster Cogburn (TG2)
    Brannigan
    McQ
    Cahill
    The Cowboys
    Arch Cynical? I can't think of any role played by Wayne that was cynical.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X